Born P, Rösch T, Triptrap A, Frimberger E, Allescher H D, Ott R, Weigert N, Lorenz R, Classen M
Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;33(5):544-9. doi: 10.1080/00365529850172142.
Long-term percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a valid alternative to surgery in patients with benign or malignant bile duct strictures in whom endoscopic drainage has failed. However, few data are available on the long-term outcome with percutaneous drainage, specially when the application of Yamakawa-type prostheses is considered.
During 1996, 48 patients who were either treated with primary PTBD insertion followed by PTBD exchanges (n = 15) or who presented only for exchange of an earlier PTBD (n = 33) were included in the study. Thirty-one patients had malignant strictures, and 17 had benign ones. The PTBD catheters were scheduled for exchange every 3 months or earlier if signs and symptoms of obstruction or other problems were present. The data were collected prospectively during each follow-up visit and included both symptoms and the status and function of the PTBD at the time of exchange.
Although PTBD was highly effective in relieving jaundice (progression of cholestasis was observed in only 2 cases), 73 of the 157 PTBD exchanges (47%) had to be carried out earlier than scheduled. Premature exchange was needed for clinical reasons, such as fever indicating PTBD dysfunction, in only 19% of these cases. The other reasons were related to the PTBD catheter and consisted of bile leakage alongside the drain (33%), PTBD disconnection or complete dislocation (30%), or occlusion suspected during regular flushing of the drain (15%). In most cases exchanging the drain was sufficient to solve the problem; in cases of complete dislocation, dilation of the same tract (n = 6) or fresh puncture and establishment of a new drainage site (n = 2) were necessary. Reducing the PTBD exchange interval from 3 to 2 months would have decreased the number of premature stent exchanges by 26%.
Although PTBD is an effective method of biliary drainage, there are frequently minor problems-mostly catheter-related-which require premature exchange of the drain in almost half of the cases, and this may affect the patients' quality of life. Improvements in PTBD materials and catheter design are therefore needed. The effectiveness of reducing the intervals between PTBD exchanges should also be examined.
对于内镜引流失败的良性或恶性胆管狭窄患者,长期经皮肝穿刺胆道引流(PTBD)是一种有效的手术替代方法。然而,关于经皮引流的长期结果,特别是考虑使用山川型假体时的数据很少。
1996年期间,48例患者纳入本研究,其中15例患者接受了初次PTBD置入并随后进行PTBD更换,33例患者仅进行早期PTBD的更换。31例患者有恶性狭窄,17例有良性狭窄。如果出现梗阻体征和症状或其他问题,PTBD导管计划每3个月或更早进行更换。每次随访时前瞻性收集数据,包括症状以及更换时PTBD的状态和功能。
尽管PTBD在缓解黄疸方面非常有效(仅2例观察到胆汁淤积进展),但157次PTBD更换中有73次(47%)不得不提前进行。其中仅19%的病例因临床原因(如发热提示PTBD功能障碍)需要提前更换。其他原因与PTBD导管有关,包括引流管旁胆汁漏(33%)、PTBD断开或完全脱位(30%)、或在定期冲洗引流管时怀疑堵塞(15%))。在大多数情况下,更换引流管足以解决问题;在完全脱位的情况下,需要扩张同一通道(6例)或重新穿刺并建立新的引流部位(2例)。将PTBD更换间隔从3个月缩短至2个月可使提前更换支架的次数减少26%。
尽管PTBD是一种有效的胆道引流方法,但经常出现一些小问题,大多数与导管相关,几乎半数病例需要提前更换引流管,这可能影响患者的生活质量。因此,需要改进PTBD材料和导管设计。还应研究缩短PTBD更换间隔时间的有效性。