Feig M, Pettitt B M
Department of Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5641 USA.
Biophys J. 1998 Jul;75(1):134-49. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77501-0.
We have recently indicated preliminary evidence of different equilibrium average structures with the CHARMM and AMBER force fields in explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations on the DNA duplex d(C5T5) . d(A5G5) (Feig, M. and B.M. Pettitt, 1997, Experiment vs. Force Fields: DNA conformation from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. (101:7361-7363). This paper presents a detailed comparison of DNA structure and dynamics for both force fields from extended simulation times of 10 ns each. Average structures display an A-DNA base geometry with the CHARMM force field and a base geometry that is intermediate between A- and B-DNA with the AMBER force field. The backbone assumes B form on both strands with the AMBER force field, while the CHARMM force field produces heterogeneous structures with the purine strand in A form and the pyrimidine strand in dynamical equilibrium between A and B conformations. The results compare well with experimental data for the cytosine/guanine part but fail to fully reproduce an overall B conformation in the thymine/adenine tract expected from crystallographic data, particularly with the CHARMM force field. Fluctuations between A and B conformations are observed on the nanosecond time scale in both simulations, particularly with the AMBER force field. Different dynamical behavior during the first 4 ns indicates that convergence times of several nanoseconds are necessary to fully establish a dynamical equilibrium in all structural quantities on the time scale of the simulations presented here.
我们最近指出,在对DNA双链体d(C5T5).d(A5G5)进行的显式溶剂分子动力学模拟中,使用CHARMM和AMBER力场得到了不同平衡平均结构的初步证据(Feig, M.和B.M. Pettitt,1997年,实验与力场:分子动力学模拟中的DNA构象。《物理化学杂志B》(101:7361 - 7363))。本文对两个力场的DNA结构和动力学进行了详细比较,每个力场都进行了10 ns的延长模拟时间。平均结构显示,CHARMM力场下呈现A-DNA碱基几何结构,而AMBER力场下的碱基几何结构介于A-DNA和B-DNA之间。在AMBER力场下,两条链的主链均呈现B型,而CHARMM力场产生的结构具有异质性,嘌呤链为A型,嘧啶链在A构象和B构象之间处于动态平衡。结果与胞嘧啶/鸟嘌呤部分的实验数据比较吻合,但未能完全重现晶体学数据所预期的胸腺嘧啶/腺嘌呤区域的整体B构象,特别是在CHARMM力场下。在两个模拟中,均在纳秒时间尺度上观察到A构象和B构象之间的波动,特别是在AMBER力场下。前4 ns内不同的动力学行为表明,在此处给出的模拟时间尺度上,需要几个纳秒的收敛时间才能在所有结构量上完全建立动态平衡。