• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕34至42周胎膜早破孕妇子代发生新生儿败血症的危险因素。

Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in offspring of women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at 34-42 weeks.

作者信息

Ladfors L, Tessin I, Mattsson L A, Eriksson M, Seeberg S, Fall O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 1998;26(2):94-101. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.2.94.

DOI:10.1515/jpme.1998.26.2.94
PMID:9650129
Abstract

One thousand three hundred eighty-five women with PROM (prelabor rupture of the membranes) participated in a prospective randomized study. Women with PROM were randomized to induction the following morning after PROM (early induction group) or induction two days later (late induction group). If contractions started within 2 hours after admission these women were included in the short latency group. All neonatal infections were classified as verified sepsis (positive culture) or clinical sepsis. The aim of the study was to compare the perinatal infectious outcome between the groups with different expectant managements in women with PROM and to study the association between demographic, intrapartum and postpartum variables and neonatal sepsis. In the short latency group one neonate had a proven sepsis while four neonates with proven sepsis were found in the early induction group. No proven sepsis was detected in the late induction group. Univariate analyses showed a significant association between clinical sepsis and: induction of labor (OR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.30-6.68), established labor 24.1-32 hours after ROM (OR = 5.89, 95% CI 1.68-20.63), established labor > 32 hours after ROM (OR = 4.59, 95% CI 1.52-13.87), time from ROM to delivery > 32 hours (OR = 5.07, 95% CI 1.40-18.39), cesarean section (OR = 11.03, 95% CI 4.10-29.68), chorioamnionitis before or during delivery (OR = 27.14, 95% CI 2.38-309.16), endometritis (OR = 18.08, 95% CI 1.82-179.87), CRP over 20 mg/l in the umbilical cord (OR = 17.12, 95% CI 5.68-52.12) and Apgar score < 7 after 1, 5 or 10 minutes. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis a significant association was found between clinical sepsis and cesarean section (OR = 10.08, 95% CI = 3.26-31.20), time from ROM to delivery > 32 h (OR = 3.74, 95% CI 1.62-8.62), gestational age 34-36 weeks (OR = 3.16, 95% CI 1.11-8.96) and parous women (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.04-5.57). In conclusion, this study indicates that that there was no difference in the incidence of neonatal infections between those with early and late induction. Clinical neonatal sepsis was associated with time from PROM to delivery over 32 hours, cesarean section, parous women and gestational age between 34 and 36 weeks.

摘要

1385名胎膜早破(PROM)的女性参与了一项前瞻性随机研究。胎膜早破的女性被随机分为胎膜早破后次日早晨引产(早期引产组)或两天后引产(晚期引产组)。如果入院后2小时内开始宫缩,这些女性被纳入短潜伏期组。所有新生儿感染分为确诊败血症(培养阳性)或临床败血症。本研究的目的是比较胎膜早破女性不同期待管理组之间的围产期感染结局,并研究人口统计学、产时和产后变量与新生儿败血症之间的关联。在短潜伏期组中,有1例新生儿确诊败血症,而早期引产组中有4例确诊败血症的新生儿。晚期引产组未检测到确诊败血症。单因素分析显示临床败血症与以下因素之间存在显著关联:引产(比值比[OR]=2.94,95%置信区间[CI]1.30 - 6.68)、胎膜破裂后24.1 - 32小时开始分娩(OR = 5.89,95% CI 1.68 - 20.63)、胎膜破裂后>32小时开始分娩(OR = 4.59,95% CI 1.52 - 13.87)、从胎膜破裂到分娩的时间>32小时(OR = 5.07,95% CI 1.40 - 18.39)、剖宫产(OR = 11.03,95% CI 4.10 - 29.68)、分娩前或分娩期间绒毛膜羊膜炎(OR = 27.14,95% CI 2.38 - 309.16)、子宫内膜炎(OR = 18.08,95% CI 1.82 - 179.87)、脐带血中C反应蛋白超过20mg/l(OR = 17.12,95% CI 5.68 - 52.12)以及1、5或10分钟后阿氏评分<7。在逐步逻辑回归分析中,发现临床败血症与剖宫产(OR = 10.08,95% CI = 3.26 - 31.20)、从胎膜破裂到分娩的时间>32小时(OR = 3.74,95% CI 1.62 - 8.62)、孕34 - 36周(OR = 3.16,95% CI 1.11 - 8.96)和经产妇(OR = 2.41,95% CI 1.04 - 5.57)之间存在显著关联。总之,本研究表明早期引产和晚期引产的新生儿感染发生率没有差异。临床新生儿败血症与从胎膜早破到分娩的时间超过32小时、剖宫产、经产妇以及孕34至36周有关。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in offspring of women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at 34-42 weeks.孕34至42周胎膜早破孕妇子代发生新生儿败血症的危险因素。
J Perinat Med. 1998;26(2):94-101. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.2.94.
2
Induction within or after 12 hours of ≥36 weeks' prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.≥36 孕周胎膜早破后 12 小时内或之后引产:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100425. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Optimal timing of labor induction after prelabor rupture of membranes at term: a secondary analysis of the TERMPROM study.足月胎膜早破后引产的最佳时机:TERMPROM 研究的二次分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):326.e1-326.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.在 34 至 37 周之间胎膜早破的孕妇中进行引产与期待治疗的随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
A randomised trial of two expectant managements of prelabour rupture of the membranes at 34 to 42 weeks.一项针对孕34至42周胎膜早破两种期待管理方法的随机试验。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Aug;103(8):755-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09869.x.
6
Prelabor rupture of membranes at term: A possible hematological triage in addition to vagino-rectal beta-hemolytic streptococcus screening for early labor induction.足月胎膜早破:除了阴道直肠β-溶血性链球菌筛查以早期引产外,可能还有血液学分诊。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261906. eCollection 2022.
7
The relation between low-grade fever during prolonged rupture of membranes (>12 hours) at term and infectious outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.足月产妇胎膜早破时间延长(>12 小时)时低热与感染结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):361.e1-361.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.054. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
Residual amniotic fluid volume in preterm rupture of membranes: association with fetal presentation and incidence of clinical and histologic evidence of infection.胎膜早破时羊水残余量:与胎儿先露及感染的临床和组织学证据发生率的关联
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Mar;14(3):125-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994111.
9
Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks.未足月胎膜早破:期待治疗至 34 周与 35 周的结局比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;36(7):659-668. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675647. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
10
Maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity in term prelabor rupture of membrane according to two induction of labor protocols.足月胎膜早破时两种引产方案的产妇和围产儿感染发病率。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1577-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07624-w. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical chorioamnionitis at term: definition, pathogenesis, microbiology, diagnosis, and treatment.足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎:定义、发病机制、微生物学、诊断和治疗。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S807-S840. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Clinical chorioamnionitis at term is characterized by changes in the plasma concentration of CHCHD2/MNRR1, a mitochondrial protein.足月时的临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的特征是血浆中 CHCHD2/MNRR1(一种线粒体蛋白)浓度的变化。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(2):2222333. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2222333.
3
Chorioamnionitis and Risk for Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
绒毛膜羊膜炎与母婴败血症风险:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):1007-1022. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004377.
4
Cellular immune responses in amniotic fluid of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.胎膜早破孕妇羊水中的细胞免疫反应。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Mar 26;48(3):222-233. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0395.
5
Microbial burden and inflammasome activation in amniotic fluid of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.胎膜早破患者羊水中的微生物负荷和炎症小体激活。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Feb 25;48(2):115-131. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0398.
6
Clinical chorioamnionitis at term IX: in vivo evidence of intra-amniotic inflammasome activation.足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎IX:羊膜腔内炎性小体激活的体内证据
J Perinat Med. 2019 Apr 24;47(3):276-287. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0271.
7
Clinical Chorioamnionitis at Term: New Insights into the Etiology, Microbiology, and the Fetal, Maternal and Amniotic Cavity Inflammatory Responses.足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎:病因、微生物学以及胎儿、母体和羊膜腔炎症反应的新见解
Nogyogyaszati Szuleszeti Tovabbkepzo Szemle. 2018 Jun;20(3):103-112.
8
Twenty-four percent of patients with clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestations have no evidence of either culture-proven intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation.早产临床绒毛膜羊膜炎患者中有24%没有经培养证实的羊膜腔内感染或羊膜腔内炎症的证据。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):604.e1-604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Clinical chorioamnionitis at term V: umbilical cord plasma cytokine profile in the context of a systemic maternal inflammatory response.足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎V:全身性母体炎症反应背景下的脐带血浆细胞因子谱
J Perinat Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):53-76. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0121.
10
Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VI: acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis according to the presence or absence of microorganisms and inflammation in the amniotic cavity.足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎VI:根据羊膜腔内有无微生物及炎症情况分类的急性绒毛膜羊膜炎和脐带炎
J Perinat Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):33-51. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0119.