Li C Y, Lai S T, Yu T J, Wang J S
Department of Surgery, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1998 May;61(5):276-80.
Despite increased awareness of risk factors, wound complications continue to be a problem following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A minimally invasive alternative was therefore developed to reduce the risk of complications while providing the same benefits as the standard open vein harvest procedure.
Video-assisted endoscopic technique for vein harvest was introduced in our medical center in October 1996. The procedure was evaluated and compared with the standard open vein harvest procedure. With the endoscopic technique, small incisions were made, each about 2-3 cm at the selected access sites (groin and above and below the knee). An endopath subcutaneous dissector was subsequently inserted along the anterior surface of the saphenous vein with the assistance of an endoscope and video monitor. The venous side branches were detected and positioned using a vessel dissector. A ligaclip was applied and the branches were divided using endopath-scissors. In some cases, the venous branches were divided directly using the endopath-scissors. Therefore, the distal and proximal ends of the saphenous vein were isolated, ligated and divided. The harvested veins were used for CABG. Each patient was evaluated for length of surgery, hospital stay and morbidity.
From October 1996 through May 1997, we performed 50 procedures using video-assisted endoscopic vein harvest. The results were compared with those from 106 patients who underwent standard open vein harvest during the same period. The rate of complications was 2% in the endoscopic group compared with 13.2% in the open group (p < 0.05). The average hospital stay was 7.2 days in the endoscopic group and 11.5 days in the open group (p < 0.05). Twelve weeks after the operation, all of the incisions healed with good cosmetic results in the endoscopic group. However, long visible scars were found in the patients in the open group.
Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest provides a minimally invasive alternative to open vein harvest. It provides good cosmetic results without a hypertrophic scar and enables the patient to regain early ambulation.
尽管对危险因素的认识有所提高,但冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后伤口并发症仍然是一个问题。因此,开发了一种微创替代方法,以降低并发症风险,同时提供与标准开放静脉采集手术相同的益处。
1996年10月,视频辅助内镜静脉采集技术在我们的医疗中心引入。对该手术进行了评估,并与标准开放静脉采集手术进行了比较。采用内镜技术时,在选定的入路部位(腹股沟以及膝关节上下)做小切口,每个切口约2-3厘米。随后,在内窥镜和视频监视器的辅助下,将内镜皮下剥离器沿大隐静脉前表面插入。使用血管剥离器检测并定位静脉侧支。应用结扎夹,并用内镜剪刀切断侧支。在某些情况下,直接用内镜剪刀切断静脉侧支。因此,分离、结扎并切断大隐静脉的远端和近端。采集的静脉用于冠状动脉旁路移植术。对每位患者的手术时间、住院时间和发病率进行评估。
1996年10月至1997年5月,我们使用视频辅助内镜静脉采集进行了50例手术。将结果与同期接受标准开放静脉采集的106例患者的结果进行比较。内镜组的并发症发生率为2%,而开放组为13.2%(p<0.05)。内镜组的平均住院时间为7.2天,开放组为11.5天(p<0.05)。术后12周,内镜组所有切口均愈合,美容效果良好。然而,开放组患者有明显的长疤痕。
内镜下大隐静脉采集为开放静脉采集提供了一种微创替代方法。它能提供良好的美容效果,不会出现增生性瘢痕,并使患者能够早期恢复行走。