Nadeau S E, Williamson D J, Crosson B, Gonzalez Rothi L J, Heilman K M
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1998 Apr;11(2):83-96.
To learn more about the functional anatomy of language, the authors used [99mTc]HMPAO single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) functional imaging to study nonword rhyming, lexical-semantics and syntax. The authors did not find any task-related differences in cerebral blood flow using region-by-region analysis of variance. This led them to examine individual subject's task-related patterns of cerebral blood flow. This analysis revealed regions of interest with little or no change but also regions with changes as great as 30%. There was marked subject-to-subject variability in the pattern of blood flow, which precluded statistically significant results using analysis of variance. An alternative analytic strategy based on numbers of subjects exceeding a minimum threshold task-related change in cerebral blood flow was tested and shows promise in identifying commonalities and differences in individual task-related blood flow patterns. The authors conclude that the complex and difficult to interpret pattern of blood flow changes observed in this study reflect in considerable part the combined effects of variability in task strategy, owing in part to insufficiently constrained task performance, and variability in functional anatomy. The authors also tested the differences in results achieved with simple normalization and analysis of covariance approaches and found them to be insignificant.
为了更多地了解语言的功能解剖学,作者使用[99mTc]HMPAO单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)功能成像来研究非词押韵、词汇语义和句法。作者通过逐区域方差分析未发现任何与任务相关的脑血流差异。这促使他们检查个体受试者与任务相关的脑血流模式。该分析揭示了几乎没有变化或没有变化的感兴趣区域,但也有变化高达30%的区域。血流模式存在显著的个体差异,这使得使用方差分析无法得出具有统计学意义的结果。一种基于超过脑血流与任务相关最小阈值变化的受试者数量的替代分析策略经过测试,在识别个体与任务相关的血流模式的共性和差异方面显示出前景。作者得出结论,本研究中观察到的复杂且难以解释的血流变化模式在很大程度上反映了任务策略变异性的综合影响,部分原因是任务表现的约束不足,以及功能解剖学的变异性。作者还测试了简单归一化和协方差分析方法所获得结果的差异,发现它们不显著。