Sperling J W, Cofield R H
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Jun;80(6):860-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00010.
The development of painful glenoid arthrosis is the most common reason for reoperation after replacement of the humeral head. We performed twenty-two revision total shoulder arthroplasties, between 1983 and 1992, for the treatment of painful glenoid arthrosis in shoulders that had a prosthetic replacement of the humeral head. Eighteen shoulders (seventeen patients) were included in the study as their preoperative and operative records were complete and they had been followed for at least two years (mean, 5.5 years; range, 2.3 to 10.0 years). The indications for the hemiarthroplasty were trauma (ten shoulders), osteoarthrosis (four), rheumatoid arthritis (two), and osteonecrosis secondary to the use of steroids (two). The mean interval between the hemiarthroplasty and the total shoulder replacement was 4.4 years (range, 0.8 to 12.7 years). The mean score for pain in the shoulder decreased from 4.3 points before the revision to 2.2 points after it (p = 0.0001). The mean active abduction increased from 94 degrees before the revision to 124 degrees after it (p = 0.01), and the mean external rotation increased from 32 to 58 degrees (p = 0.007). Two shoulders needed another operation after the revision because of a late infection in one and particulate synovitis associated with instability in the other. With the numbers available for study, we did not detect a significant difference in pain relief and range of motion with respect to gender, diagnosis, subluxation, or the presence of periprosthetic radiolucency. Our findings indicate that most patients with painful glenoid arthrosis after a hemiarthroplasty have marked pain relief and improvement in motion after revision to a total shoulder replacement. However, seven of the eighteen shoulders that had this procedure had an unsatisfactory result due to a limited range of motion or the need for a subsequent operation. Therefore, long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the durability of total shoulder replacement in this group of patients.
疼痛性盂关节病的发展是肱骨头置换术后再次手术最常见的原因。1983年至1992年间,我们对22例因肱骨头假体置换后出现疼痛性盂关节病的患者施行了翻修全肩关节置换术。18例肩部(17例患者)纳入研究,因其术前和手术记录完整且随访至少两年(平均5.5年;范围2.3至10.0年)。半关节成形术的指征为创伤(10例肩部)、骨关节炎(4例)、类风湿关节炎(2例)以及类固醇使用继发的骨坏死(2例)。半关节成形术与全肩关节置换术之间的平均间隔时间为4.4年(范围0.8至12.7年)。肩部疼痛的平均评分从翻修术前的4.3分降至术后的2.2分(p = 0.0001)。平均主动外展从翻修术前的94度增加至术后的124度(p = 0.01),平均外旋从32度增加至58度(p = 0.007)。翻修术后,2例肩部因1例出现晚期感染和另1例与不稳定相关的颗粒性滑膜炎而需要再次手术。就现有研究数量而言,我们未发现疼痛缓解和活动范围在性别、诊断、半脱位或假体周围透亮线方面存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,大多数半关节成形术后出现疼痛性盂关节病的患者在翻修至全肩关节置换术后疼痛明显缓解且活动改善。然而,接受该手术的18例肩部中有7例结果不满意,原因是活动范围受限或需要后续手术。因此,有必要进行长期研究以评估该组患者全肩关节置换术的耐久性。