Kim Kelvin, Elbuluk Ameer, Jia Nathan, Osmani Feroz, Levieddin Joseph, Zuckerman Joseph, Virk Mandeep
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 E 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 24;15(4):922-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.030. eCollection 2018 Dec.
The study evaluates patient-reported outcomes in revision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) according to etiology.
Twenty-three consecutive RevSA (minimum 2-year follow-up) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and range of motion were compared by the type of revision procedure and indication.
EQ5D-QOL, VAS-pain, ASES, and forward elevation improved after RevSA. The infection group had least improvements. Revision to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) demonstrated the most improvement in VAS-pain, forward elevation, and ASES.
Revision to RTSA significantly improved PRO scores compared to hemi- or total shoulder arthroplasty. RevSA for infection demonstrated the least improvement in outcomes.
本研究根据病因评估翻修肩关节置换术(RevSA)患者报告的结局。
回顾性分析连续23例RevSA患者(至少随访2年)。根据翻修手术类型和指征比较患者报告结局(PRO)评分及活动范围。
RevSA术后EQ5D生活质量、视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分(VAS-疼痛)、美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分及前屈上举角度均有改善。感染组改善最少。翻修为反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的患者在VAS-疼痛、前屈上举角度及ASES评分方面改善最为明显。
与半肩关节置换术或全肩关节置换术相比,翻修为RTSA显著改善了PRO评分。因感染而行RevSA的患者结局改善最少。