• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群的腹腔镜疝修补术

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the geriatric population.

作者信息

Velasco J M, Vallina V L, Esposito D J, Theodore S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rush North Shore Medical Center, Skokie, Illinois 60076, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):633-7.

PMID:9655273
Abstract

Laparoscopy has brought controversy to herniorrhaphy, particularly in the elderly. We reviewed our experience with this technique in patients older than 65 years at a single teaching institution. Data include demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, operative time, hernia type, type of repair, hospital stay, and complications. A telephone questionnaire was used to assess return to normal activity, recurrence, and reason for choosing the laparoscopic approach. From March 1992 through March 1996, 110 of 328 patients were eligible. Mean age was 73 +/- 5.6 years; 34 patients had bilateral and 20 had recurrent hernias; 73 patients (66.4%) were ASA-2, and 22 (20%) were ASA-3. The extra-abdominal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches were used in 64 and 46 patients, respectively; mean operative time was 87.9 +/- 34 minutes. The overall complication rate was 15 per cent, with 71 per cent of these being urinary retention. Patients were discharged the same day (59%) and at 1 day (33%). Follow-up was available in 84.5 per cent. Recurrence rate was 9.7 per cent, which was not significantly influenced by complication rate, hernia repair type, or ASA class. Median return to normal activity was 7 days. ASA classification correlated with hospital stay (P = .02), but not with complications, recurrence, or return to normal activities (P = not significant). Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy appears safe in the elderly.

摘要

腹腔镜检查给疝修补术带来了争议,尤其是在老年患者中。我们回顾了在一家单一教学机构中对65岁以上患者使用该技术的经验。数据包括人口统计学资料、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、手术时间、疝的类型、修补类型、住院时间和并发症。通过电话问卷调查来评估恢复正常活动情况、复发情况以及选择腹腔镜手术入路的原因。从1992年3月至1996年3月,328例患者中有110例符合条件。平均年龄为73±5.6岁;34例为双侧疝,20例为复发性疝;73例患者(66.4%)为ASA-2级,22例(20%)为ASA-3级。分别有64例和46例患者采用了腹外和经腹腹膜前入路;平均手术时间为87.9±34分钟。总体并发症发生率为15%,其中71%为尿潴留。59%的患者在同一天出院,33%的患者在术后1天出院。随访率为84.5%。复发率为9.7%,不受并发症发生率、疝修补类型或ASA分级的显著影响。恢复正常活动的中位时间为7天。ASA分级与住院时间相关(P = 0.02),但与并发症、复发或恢复正常活动无关(P = 无显著性差异)。腹腔镜疝修补术在老年患者中似乎是安全的。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the geriatric population.老年人群的腹腔镜疝修补术
Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):633-7.
2
[Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair].[无张力腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术]
Minerva Chir. 2004 Aug;59(4):369-77.
3
After 10 years and 1903 inguinal hernias, what is the outcome for the laparoscopic repair?经过10年和1903例腹股沟疝手术,腹腔镜修补术的结果如何?
Surg Endosc. 2002 Aug;16(8):1201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8341-1. Epub 2002 May 3.
4
[Prospective controlled study comparing laparoscopy and the Shouldice technique in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia].[比较腹腔镜手术与Shouldice技术治疗单侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性对照研究]
Ann Chir. 1996;50(9):776-81.
5
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study.脊髓麻醉下腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:一项初步研究。
Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):456-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.038.
6
Laparoscopic repair of bilateral and recurrent hernias.双侧及复发性疝的腹腔镜修补术。
Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):839-42; discussion 842-3.
7
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: optimal technical variations and results in 1700 cases.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:1700例手术的最佳技术变异及结果
Am Surg. 2000 Sep;66(9):848-52.
8
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias with higher risk for recurrence: independent assessment of results from 121 repairs.腹腔镜修补复发风险较高的腹股沟疝:121例修补术结果的独立评估
Am Surg. 2001 Feb;67(2):155-8.
9
Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair?经腹腹腔镜疝修补术还是完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术?
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Aug;8(4):264-8.
10
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair on patients over 75 years of age.75岁以上患者腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jun 15;8(6):10016-20. eCollection 2015.
2
The incidence of trocar-site hernia in minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a comparison of multi versus single-port laparoscopy.微创减重手术中套管部位疝的发生率:多孔与单孔腹腔镜的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1287-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2597-5. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians.
腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术治疗 80 岁以上老年人。
Hernia. 2011 Dec;15(6):655-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0838-5. Epub 2011 Jun 21.