Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Suter P M, Pedoto A, Vercesi P, Lissoni A
Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Universita' di Milano and Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Ospedale Maggiore IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;158(1):3-11. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9708031.
To assess the possible differences in respiratory mechanics between the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) originating from pulmonary disease (ARDSp) and that originating from extrapulmonary disease (ARDSexp) we measured the total respiratory system (Est,rs), chest wall (Est,w) and lung (Est,L) elastance, the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) at 0, 5, 10, and 15 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in 12 patients with ARDSp and nine with ARDSexp. At zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), Est,rs and EELV were similar in both groups of patients. The Est,L, however, was markedly higher in the ARDSp group than in the ARDSexp group (20.2 +/- 5.4 versus 13.8 +/- 5.0 cm H2O/L, p < 0.05), whereas Est,w was abnormally increased in the ARDSexp group (12.1 +/- 3.8 versus 5.2 +/- 1.9 cm H2O/L, p < 0.05). The IAP was higher in ARDSexp than in ARDSp (22.2 +/- 6.0 versus 8.5 +/- 2.9 cm H2O, p < 0.01), and it significantly correlated with Est,w (p < 0. 01). Increasing PEEP to 15 cm H2O caused an increase of Est,rs in ARDSp (from 25.4 +/- 6.2 to 31.2 +/- 11.3 cm H2O/L, p < 0.01) and a decrease in ARDSexp (from 25.9 +/- 5.4 to 21.4 +/- 55.5 cm H2O/L, p < 0.01). The estimated recruitment at 15 cm H2O PEEP was -0.031 +/- 0.092 versus 0.293 +/- 0.241 L in ARDSp and ARDSexp, respectively (p < 0.01). The different respiratory mechanics and response to PEEP observed are consistent with a prevalence of consolidation in ARDSp as opposed to prevalent edema and alveolar collapse in ARDSexp.
为评估源自肺部疾病的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDSp)和源自肺外疾病的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDSexp)之间呼吸力学的可能差异,我们在12例ARDSp患者和9例ARDSexp患者中,于呼气末正压(PEEP)为0、5、10和15 cm H₂O时测量了总呼吸系统弹性(Est,rs)、胸壁弹性(Est,w)和肺弹性(Est,L)、腹腔内压力(IAP)以及呼气末肺容积(EELV)。在呼气末零压力(ZEEP)时,两组患者的Est,rs和EELV相似。然而,ARDSp组的Est,L显著高于ARDSexp组(20.2±5.4 vs 13.8±5.0 cm H₂O/L,p<0.05),而ARDSexp组的Est,w异常升高(12.1±3.8 vs 5.2±1.9 cm H₂O/L,p<0.05)。ARDSexp组的IAP高于ARDSp组(22.2±6.0 vs 8.5±2.9 cm H₂O,p<0.01),且与Est,w显著相关(p<0.01)。将PEEP增加至15 cm H₂O导致ARDSp组的Est,rs增加(从25.4±6.2增至31.2±11.3 cm H₂O/L,p<0.01),而ARDSexp组则降低(从25.9±5.4降至21.4±55.5 cm H₂O/L,p<0.01)。在15 cm H₂O PEEP时,ARDSp组和ARDSexp组的估计肺复张分别为-0.031±0.092和0.293±0.241 L(p<0.01)。观察到的不同呼吸力学和对PEEP的反应与ARDSp中实变更为普遍,而ARDSexp中水肿和肺泡萎陷更为普遍一致。