Scott C B, Bogdanffy G M
The Heart and Lung Group of Savannah, GA, USA.
Int J Sports Med. 1998 May;19(4):277-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971918.
Ramp tests are often manipulated so that oxygen uptake is able to interpret energy expenditure in its entirety. We hypothesized that oxygen deficits during ramp exercise to exhaustion would be significant, providing a more complete description of the types of energy expenditure available for this mode of testing. Oxygen deficits were obtained during a slow ramp (681 +/- 71 s) and a fast ramp (275 +/- 33 s) to exhaustion. Twelve healthy men (age 35 +/- 3 yrs; VO2max 51 +/- 10 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) performed several 10 min submaximal bike rides (at or below ventilatory threshold) to determine work rate -O2 uptake demands. Estimated O2 demands were compared to measured O2 uptake during each ramp test, the difference representing an oxygen deficit. Work levels were controlled and measurements collected with a commercially available electrically braked bike ergometer and metabolic testing system (MedGraphics, Minn., MN). Data were collected and averaged in 30 s time periods, power in watts (W), energy expenditure in cumulative O2 (L). Using a paired t-test, cumulative O2 uptakes were significantly lower (p = 0.0001) when measured O2 uptakes (26.0 L +/- 4.5 for slow ramp; 10.8 L +/- 2.8 for fast ramp) were compared to estimated O2 demands (29.0 L +/- 3.7 for slow ramp; 14.1 L +/- 3.5 for fast ramp). Anaerobic energy expenditures (oxygen deficits) represented 10.8% and 23.4% of total energy expenditure for slow ramps and fast ramps, respectively. Comparisons of the slopes for each test condition revealed significant differences (steady state > slow ramp > fast ramp; p = 0.0001,ANOVA). We conclude that the oxygen deficit during ramp testing represents a significant part of total energy expenditure.
递增负荷测试常常经过人为操控,以便摄氧量能够完整地阐释能量消耗情况。我们推测,递增运动至力竭过程中的氧亏会很显著,从而能更全面地描述这种测试模式下可用的能量消耗类型。在缓慢递增(681±71秒)和快速递增(275±33秒)至力竭的过程中获取氧亏数据。12名健康男性(年龄35±3岁;最大摄氧量51±10毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)进行了数次10分钟的次最大强度骑行(在通气阈或低于通气阈),以确定功率-摄氧量需求。将每次递增负荷测试期间的估计摄氧量需求与实测摄氧量进行比较,二者差值即为氧亏。工作强度通过商用电动刹车自行车测力计和代谢测试系统(MedGraphics,明尼苏达州,明尼阿波利斯)进行控制并收集测量数据。数据以30秒时间段进行收集并求平均值,功率单位为瓦特(W),能量消耗以累积氧气量(L)表示。使用配对t检验,当将实测摄氧量(缓慢递增时为26.0升±4.5;快速递增时为10.8升±2.8)与估计摄氧量需求(缓慢递增时为29.0升±3.7;快速递增时为14.1升±3.5)进行比较时,累积摄氧量显著更低(p = 0.0001)。无氧能量消耗(氧亏)分别占缓慢递增和快速递增时总能量消耗的10.8%和23.4%。对每种测试条件下的斜率进行比较,发现存在显著差异(稳态>缓慢递增>快速递增;p = 0.0001,方差分析)。我们得出结论,递增负荷测试期间的氧亏是总能量消耗的重要组成部分。