Roca J, Burgos F, Sunyer J, Saez M, Chinn S, Antó J M, Rodríguez-Roisin R, Quanjer P H, Nowak D, Burney P
Dept de Medicina, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Eur Respir J. 1998 Jun;11(6):1354-62. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061354.
The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) prediction equations exemplify a significant effort carried out approximately 15 yrs ago to provide uniform standards for lung function testing, but this set of equations has not been properly validated as yet. The present study evaluates the ECSC reference values and four other sets of prediction equations, using spirometric data collected in 12,900 nonasthmatic subjects (43% lifetime nonsmokers and 36% active smokers) aged 20-44 yrs from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). Standardized spirometric measurements were obtained using a common protocol in 34 centres in 14 countries. For each prediction equation, the prediction deviations (i.e. observed minus predicted value) for forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were examined for the whole study population and for each centre. For the age range included, the errors about the ECSC equations showed the most prominent underestimation of both predicted FVC (+355 and +360 mL on average in males and females, respectively) and predicted FEV1 (+211 and +200 mL, respectively) among the five studies examined. As expected, FVC and FEV1 in active smokers from the ECRHS were significantly lower than in lifetime nonsmokers (each p<0.01). We conclude that the present European recommendations on lung function reference values should be reconsidered, but further data for nonsymptomatic subjects above the age of 44 yrs are needed.
欧洲煤钢共同体(ECSC)预测方程是大约15年前为提供肺功能测试统一标准而做出的一项重大努力,但这组方程尚未得到充分验证。本研究使用从欧洲共同体呼吸健康调查(ECRHS)收集的12900名年龄在20 - 44岁的非哮喘受试者(43%为终生不吸烟者,36%为现吸烟者)的肺活量数据,对ECSC参考值和其他四组预测方程进行了评估。在14个国家的34个中心按照通用方案获得了标准化的肺活量测量值。对于每个预测方程,在整个研究人群和每个中心检查了用力肺活量(FVC)和一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的预测偏差(即观察值减去预测值)。在所研究的五项研究中,对于所涵盖的年龄范围,ECSC方程的误差显示出对预测FVC(男性和女性平均分别高估355和360 mL)和预测FEV1(分别高估211和200 mL)的低估最为显著。正如预期的那样,ECRHS中现吸烟者的FVC和FEV1显著低于终生不吸烟者(p均<0.01)。我们得出结论,目前欧洲关于肺功能参考值的建议应重新考虑,但需要44岁以上无症状受试者的更多数据。