McWilliams R G, Robertson I, Smye S W, Wijesinghe L, Kessel D
Department of Vascular Radiology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Jun;15(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80116-0.
To investigate potential errors associated with different techniques of intra-arterial pressure measurement at angiography.
An experimental model of an arterial stenosis was developed. Experiments were performed to assess the relevance of catheter position, catheter direction and catheter type on the recorded intraluminal pressure. Transstenotic pressure gradients were recorded with and without angiographic catheters crossing the stenosis.
At physiological flow rates angiographic catheter type does not influence the recorded pressure. At high flow rates through tight stenoses there is a significant catheter-related difference in recorded pressure adjacent to a stenosis. Downstream pressures may be altered by up to 85 mmHg when standard angiographic catheters are placed across a stenosis.
The different techniques employed to measure pressure differences across a model stenosis may introduce significant errors up to 85 mmHg. Care must be taken when pressure measurements alone are used to interpret the clinical significance of a stenosis. In low flow conditions there may not be a detectable pressure gradient across a 95% stenosis.
研究血管造影术中不同动脉内压力测量技术相关的潜在误差。
建立动脉狭窄的实验模型。进行实验以评估导管位置、导管方向和导管类型对记录的管腔内压力的影响。在有和没有血管造影导管穿过狭窄部位的情况下记录跨狭窄压力梯度。
在生理流速下,血管造影导管类型不影响记录的压力。在通过严重狭窄部位的高流速情况下,狭窄部位附近记录的压力存在与导管相关的显著差异。当标准血管造影导管穿过狭窄部位时,下游压力可能会改变高达85 mmHg。
用于测量模型狭窄部位压力差的不同技术可能会引入高达85 mmHg的显著误差。仅使用压力测量来解释狭窄的临床意义时必须谨慎。在低流量情况下,95%狭窄部位可能不存在可检测到的压力梯度。