Lane-Petter W
J Med Ethics. 1976 Sep;2(3):118-26.
Animal experimentation arouses great emotion in many people, perhaps more especially in Britain, and this has increased as more sophisticated medical and non-medical animal experiments are demanded by modern research. The Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876 is the only legal regulation of experiments in animals, and many of its clauses are ambiguous. So in 1963 a committee of enquiry - the Littlewood Committee - was set up. Dr Lane-Petter examines the emotional and factual background to the enquiry, and discusses in an ethical context the usefulness and positive advantages of animal experiments compared with those of possible substitutes and in some detail three of the questions left unanswered by the Littlewood Committee.
动物实验在许多人当中引发了强烈的情绪反应,在英国可能尤为如此。随着现代研究对更为复杂的医学和非医学动物实验需求的增加,这种情况愈发严重。1876年的《动物保护法》是对动物实验的唯一法律规定,其许多条款都含糊不清。因此,1963年成立了一个调查委员会——利特伍德委员会。莱恩 - 彼得博士审视了该调查的情感和事实背景,并在伦理背景下讨论了动物实验相对于可能的替代方法的有用性和积极优势,还详细探讨了利特伍德委员会未解答的三个问题。