Suppr超能文献

磁共振胰胆管造影:半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波与二维快速自旋回波脉冲序列的比较。

MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.

作者信息

Kim T K, Han J K, Kim S J, Bae S H, Choi B I

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 1998 Jul-Aug;23(4):398-403. doi: 10.1007/s002619900368.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo spin-echo (HASTE) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D TSE) MRCP for imaging pancreatobiliary diseases.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with biliary or pancreatic disease underwent MRCP on a 1.0-T scanner with a body phased-array coil. A T2-weighted HASTE sequence (18 s) and a T2-weighted 2D TSE sequence (45 s) were used during a breath-hold by the patient. The source images and maximum intensity projection images of both sequences were reviewed independently by two radiologists.

RESULTS

Motion artifacts were more severely pronounced with 2D TSE sequences than with HASTE sequences (p < 0.001). All obstructions and their sites were accurately identified with both sequences. Filling defects (calculi) in bile ducts were identified in all 22 segments (100%) with HASTE-MRCP, whereas calculi in 19 of 22 segments (86%) were identified with 2D TSE-MRCP (p = 0.25). Three missed sites on 2D TSE-MRCP were intrahepatic bile ducts.

CONCLUSIONS

HASTE-MRCP is superior to 2D TSE-MRCP in terms of detecting motion artifacts and visualization of the pancreatic ducts. HASTE-MRCP is comparable to 2D TSE-MRCP for visualization of the biliary ducts and their obstruction and is superior to 2D TSE-MRCP for identification of calculi in intrahepatic bile ducts.

摘要

背景

比较半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波(HASTE)磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)与二维快速自旋回波(2D TSE)MRCP对胰胆管疾病的成像效果。

方法

27例胆胰疾病患者在1.0-T扫描仪上使用体部相控阵线圈进行MRCP检查。患者屏气期间使用T2加权HASTE序列(18秒)和T2加权2D TSE序列(45秒)。两位放射科医生分别独立查看两个序列的原始图像和最大强度投影图像。

结果

2D TSE序列的运动伪影比HASTE序列更严重(p<0.001)。两个序列均能准确识别所有梗阻及其部位。HASTE-MRCP在所有22个节段(100%)中均识别出胆管内的充盈缺损(结石),而2D TSE-MRCP在22个节段中的19个(86%)识别出结石(p=0.25)。2D TSE-MRCP上三个漏诊部位为肝内胆管。

结论

在检测运动伪影和胰管可视化方面,HASTE-MRCP优于2D TSE-MRCP。在胆管及其梗阻的可视化方面,HASTE-MRCP与2D TSE-MRCP相当,在肝内胆管结石的识别方面,HASTE-MRCP优于2D TSE-MRCP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验