Cova Maria, Stacul Fulvio, Cester Gabriella, Ukmar Maja, Pozzi Mucelli Roberto
Unità Clinica Operativa di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste.
Radiol Med. 2003 Sep;106(3):178-90.
To compare 2D single-shot Fast Spin-Echo (FSE) and two 3D FSE MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences with different slice thickness in the evaluation of normal and abnormal biliary and pancreatic duct systems.
Thirty-two consecutive patients, both with normal biliary and pancreatic ducts (n=14) and with different biliary and/or pancreatic duct disease (n=18) underwent MRCP with a 1.5 T superconductive magnet. One 2D single-shot FSE and two 3D FSE MRCP sequences with different slice thickness (1.6 mm and 3 mm) were performed in each patient. Images were analysed with regards to: artefacts (0=none, 1=minimal, 2=present but not affecting the diagnostic evaluation, 3=present and affecting the diagnostic evaluation), image quality (0=non-diagnostic, 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent), duct conspicuity (0=not-visible, 1=poor, 2=good, 3=excellent), diagnostic confidence (possible presence of dilatations, stones and stenoses).
Artefacts were rarely present, without significant differences among the three sequences. The 2D single-shot FSE sequence provided a significantly better image quality and significantly better conspicuity of the intrahepatic and pancreatic ducts in comparison to both the 1.6-mm and 3-mm thickness 3D FSE sequences. The three sequences yielded identical results in the detection of 17 cases of dilatation and 10 cases of stenosis as well as in the evaluation of their degree. Stones in the biliary tree were detected in 6 cases with the 2D single-shot FSE sequence, in 5 cases in the MIP images of the 3D FSE sequence with slice thickness of 1.6 mm and in 4 cases in the MIP images of the 3D FSE sequence with slice thickness of 3 mm. The diagnostic confidence did not show statistically significant differences among the three sequences.
The 2D single-shot FSE sequence proved to be superior to the 3D FSE sequences in the evaluation of normal and abnormal biliary and pancreatic duct systems.
比较二维单次激发快速自旋回波(FSE)序列和两种具有不同层厚的三维FSE磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)序列在评估正常及异常胆管和胰管系统中的表现。
32例连续患者,包括胆管和胰管均正常者(n = 14)以及患有不同胆管和/或胰管疾病者(n = 18),使用1.5 T超导磁体进行MRCP检查。每位患者均接受一次二维单次激发FSE序列以及两种具有不同层厚(1.6 mm和3 mm)的三维FSE MRCP序列检查。对图像进行如下分析:伪影(0 = 无,1 = 极少,2 = 存在但不影响诊断评估,3 = 存在且影响诊断评估)、图像质量(0 = 无法诊断,1 = 差,2 = 一般,3 = 好,4 = 优)、胆管显示清晰度(0 = 不可见,1 = 差,2 = 好,3 = 优)、诊断可信度(扩张、结石和狭窄的可能存在情况)。
伪影很少出现,三种序列之间无显著差异。与1.6 mm和3 mm层厚的三维FSE序列相比,二维单次激发FSE序列提供了显著更好的图像质量以及肝内和胰管的显著更好的显示清晰度。三种序列在检测17例扩张和10例狭窄以及评估其程度方面得出了相同的结果。二维单次激发FSE序列检测出6例胆管结石,1.6 mm层厚的三维FSE序列的最大强度投影(MIP)图像中检测出5例,3 mm层厚的三维FSE序列的MIP图像中检测出4例。三种序列之间的诊断可信度没有统计学上的显著差异。
在评估正常及异常胆管和胰管系统方面,二维单次激发FSE序列被证明优于三维FSE序列。