Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A H, Heracleous E, Costa J C, Gourtsoyiannis N
MR Clinical Scientist-Philips Greece Medical Systems, Athens.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Nov;17(9):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00074-0.
The purpose of this study was to compare the relative conspicuity of the pancreaticobiliary tree on respiratory-triggered three-dimensional turbo spin echo (3D TSE RT) and breath hold single-shot turbo spin echo (SSTSE BH) acquisitions respectively in MRCP imaging. Both techniques were applied to 61 patients with clinically suspected pancreaticobiliary disease using a 1.0 T MR system. All images were reviewed blindly. Qualitative comparison was made by grading subjectively the conspicuity of extrahepatic, intrahepatic, and main pancreatic ducts. Quantitative comparison included calculations of signal-to-noise ratio of the common bile duct, main pancreatic duct, gallbladder, liver, and contrast-to-noise ratio, relative contrast between common bile duct, gallbladder, and liver. 3D TSE RT provided significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio of the common bile duct (mean value 163.19) and main pancreatic duct (mean value 95.37) compared to SSTSE BH (mean values 76.24 and 26.22, respectively). 3D TSE RT was inferior to SSTSE BH for the depiction of intrahepatic ducts and pancreatic duct (head portion). 3D TSE RT and SSTSE BH sequences provide complimentary information in the visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Further comparative clinical studies are needed to redefine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRCP using both sequences.
本研究的目的是比较在磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)成像中,呼吸触发三维快速自旋回波(3D TSE RT)和屏气单次激发快速自旋回波(SSTSE BH)采集方式下胰胆管树的相对显影清晰度。使用1.0 T磁共振系统对61例临床怀疑患有胰胆管疾病的患者应用了这两种技术。所有图像均进行了盲法评估。通过主观分级肝外、肝内和主胰管的显影清晰度进行定性比较。定量比较包括计算胆总管、主胰管、胆囊、肝脏的信噪比以及对比度噪声比、胆总管、胆囊和肝脏之间的相对对比度。与SSTSE BH(平均值分别为76.24和26.22)相比,3D TSE RT在胆总管(平均值163.19)和主胰管(平均值95.37)的信噪比方面显著更高。在肝内胆管和胰管(头部)的显示方面,3D TSE RT不如SSTSE BH。3D TSE RT和SSTSE BH序列在胆管和胰管的可视化中提供互补信息。需要进一步的比较临床研究来重新定义使用这两种序列的MRCP的敏感性、特异性和准确性。