Suppr超能文献

面部动物咬伤的处理:94例患者的经验

Management of animal bite injuries of the face: experience with 94 patients.

作者信息

Wolff K D

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Free University of Berlin, Benjamin-Franklin Medical Center, Germany.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Jul;56(7):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90009-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Because of the large number of bacteria in the oral cavity, animal bite wounds are generally contaminated, and their treatment is difficult because of the risk of infection, especially in extensive injuries. This report describes the management of a large series of patients and recommends treatment guidelines on the basis of the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-four animal bite wounds on the face and head were analyzed according to the type of animal, location and extent of the soft tissue wound, duration and type of surgical treatment, occurrence of infections and their pathogen spectrum, as well as the choice of antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Dogs caused 91% of the bite wounds. Infections developed in 4 of 53 patients who underwent primary wound closure with minor edge excision and prophylactic administration of oral penicillin. Without antibiotic administration, 2 of 15 patients had infections, which were treated on an outpatient basis. Of 26 patients with initially delayed treatment, 18 showed clinical inflammatory symptoms with a wide spectrum of pathogens (Escherichia coli, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Proteus) on presentation.

CONCLUSION

Extensive animal bite wounds on the face, even with soft tissue defects, should be treated according to the criteria of a esthetic reconstructive facial surgery. In view of the low infection rate, routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not justified.

摘要

目的

由于口腔内细菌数量众多,动物咬伤伤口通常受到污染,且由于存在感染风险,其治疗较为困难,尤其是在伤口广泛的情况下。本报告描述了对大量患者的治疗情况,并根据结果推荐治疗指南。

患者与方法

对94例面部和头部的动物咬伤伤口进行分析,内容包括动物类型、软组织伤口的位置和范围、手术治疗的持续时间和类型、感染的发生情况及其病原体谱,以及抗生素治疗的选择。

结果

91%的咬伤伤口由狗造成。53例接受了轻微边缘切除并预防性口服青霉素的一期伤口缝合患者中,有4例发生感染。在未使用抗生素的15例患者中,有2例发生感染,在门诊接受了治疗。在26例最初延迟治疗的患者中,18例出现临床炎症症状,就诊时病原体种类广泛(大肠杆菌、链球菌、肠球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和变形杆菌)。

结论

面部广泛的动物咬伤伤口,即使存在软组织缺损,也应按照面部美容重建手术的标准进行治疗。鉴于感染率较低,常规抗生素预防并无必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验