Wierzbicki A S, Lumb P J, Semra Y K, Crook M A
Department of Chemical Pathology, St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK.
QJM. 1998 Apr;91(4):291-4. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.4.291.
Lipid targets can be difficult to attain in familial hypercholesterolaemia. To compare atorvastatin with simvastatin-fenofibrate and simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy, we studied 54 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia over periods of 2-6 months on each therapeutic regimen. The atorvastatin regimen reduced total cholesterol by 41.2 +/- 11.2%, LDL by 45.6 +/- 15.5%, triglycerides by 33.8 +/- 24.8%, and increased HDL by 2.3 +/- 37.0%. Simvastatin-fenofibrate therapy achieved reductions of 33.9 +/- 8.5% in cholesterol, 42.0 +/- 12.2% in LDL, 34.7 +/- 38.3% for triglycerides, and a 25.4 +/- 55.1% increase in HDL. Simvastatin-cholestyramine gave a reduction of 31.3 +/- 11.8% in cholesterol, 36.0 +/- 14.4% in LDL, 13.7 +/- 36.3% in triglycerides, and a 1.1 +/- 30.3% rise in HDL. The atorvastatin regimen was marginally but not significantly better than simvastatin-fenofibrate in improving the LDL:HDL ratio, LDL:apoB and and apolipoprotein B:A1 ratios. Eleven patients (20.4%) had side-effects: two discontinued atorvastatin due to side-effects; two patients had rashes; six had myalgia and two had diarrhoea. Gastrointestinal side-effects were described in 16 (30.1%) patients on simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy and four cases of myalgia (11.2%) were seen with simvastatin-fenofibrate. In nine patients on atorvastatin (20.4%) a 30% or greater fall in HDL was observed, compared to five patients with resin therapy (9.2%) and two with fibrate therapy (5.5%). There were no significant differences in liver or muscle biochemistry between the regimens, but atorvastatin did raise transaminase and creatine kinase concentrations significantly compared to pre-treatment values (p = 0.001). Atorvastatin significantly improves the lipid profile in most patients compared with other regimens. It has a comparable incidence of side-effects to combination therapy regimens.
在家族性高胆固醇血症中,脂质目标可能难以实现。为了比较阿托伐他汀与辛伐他汀-非诺贝特以及辛伐他汀-考来烯胺疗法,我们对54例家族性高胆固醇血症患者进行了研究,每位患者在每种治疗方案下接受2至6个月的治疗。阿托伐他汀治疗方案使总胆固醇降低了41.2±11.2%,低密度脂蛋白降低了45.6±15.5%,甘油三酯降低了33.8±24.8%,高密度脂蛋白升高了2.3±37.0%。辛伐他汀-非诺贝特疗法使胆固醇降低了33.9±8.5%,低密度脂蛋白降低了42.0±12.2%,甘油三酯降低了34.7±38.3%,高密度脂蛋白升高了25.4±55.1%。辛伐他汀-考来烯胺使胆固醇降低了31.3±11.8%,低密度脂蛋白降低了36.0±14.4%,甘油三酯降低了13.7±36.3%,高密度脂蛋白升高了1.1±30.3%。在改善低密度脂蛋白:高密度脂蛋白比值、低密度脂蛋白:载脂蛋白B以及载脂蛋白B:A1比值方面,阿托伐他汀治疗方案略好于辛伐他汀-非诺贝特,但差异无统计学意义。11例患者(20.4%)出现了副作用:2例因副作用停用阿托伐他汀;2例患者出现皮疹;6例出现肌痛,2例出现腹泻。在接受辛伐他汀-考来烯胺治疗的患者中,16例(30.1%)出现胃肠道副作用,在接受辛伐他汀-非诺贝特治疗的患者中,有4例(11.2%)出现肌痛。在接受阿托伐他汀治疗的9例患者(20.4%)中,观察到高密度脂蛋白下降30%或更多,相比之下,接受树脂疗法的有5例(9.2%),接受贝特类疗法的有2例(5.5%)。各治疗方案之间肝脏或肌肉生化指标无显著差异,但与治疗前值相比,阿托伐他汀确实显著提高了转氨酶和肌酸激酶浓度(p = 0.001)。与其他治疗方案相比,阿托伐他汀能显著改善大多数患者的血脂谱。其副作用发生率与联合治疗方案相当。