• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿异常检测的敏感性与时间的关系。

Sensitivity of fetal anomaly detection as a function of time.

作者信息

Dervaux B, Leleu H, Lebrun T, Levi S, Grandjean H

机构信息

CRESGE, Department of Health Economics, Catholic University of Lille, France.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:125-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08933.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08933.x
PMID:9668705
Abstract

In this paper, we show that the ratio of the number of fetal anomalies detected by ultrasounds (US) to the total number of cases is not a consistent estimator of the US sensitivity. As Eddy pointed out, when the disease evolves over time, the sensitivity of a test also varies over time according to the development of the disease. To assess correctly the detection capability of a test, it is therefore necessary to estimate a time continuous function (sensitivity function) instead of a single parameter. From a methodological point of view, by considering the "detectability" time of a fetal anomaly as a random variable and parametrizing its distribution function, we estimate the probability that an anomaly is detected conditional upon the precise timing of actually performed US during pregnancy. We fit this model with Eurofetus data (about 7,300 abnormal fetuses), and we compare estimations for different kinds of anomalies (classification based on the system involved and/or severity of the handicap). To allow for heterogeneity of anomalies regarding the detectability time, we generally adopt mixture models. For instance, we select a bi-gamma distribution for major malformations and estimate that 63% of such anomalies are detectable quite early in pregnancy (conditional mean: 15.2 weeks of amenorrhea (WA) +/- 4.2 WA), the others becoming detectable later (30.3 WA +/- 6.4 WA). Such results are then integrated in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

摘要

在本文中,我们表明超声(US)检测出的胎儿异常数量与病例总数的比率并非超声敏感度的一致估计量。正如埃迪所指出的,当疾病随时间演变时,一项检测的敏感度也会根据疾病的发展随时间变化。因此,为了正确评估一项检测的检测能力,有必要估计一个时间连续函数(敏感度函数)而非单个参数。从方法学角度来看,通过将胎儿异常的“可检测性”时间视为一个随机变量并对其分布函数进行参数化,我们估计在孕期实际进行超声检查的精确时间条件下检测到异常的概率。我们用欧洲胎儿数据(约7300例异常胎儿)拟合此模型,并比较不同类型异常(基于所涉及的系统和/或残疾严重程度进行分类)的估计值。为了考虑异常在可检测性时间方面的异质性,我们通常采用混合模型。例如,对于严重畸形我们选择双伽马分布,并估计63%的此类异常在孕期相当早的时候就可检测到(条件均值:停经15.2周(WA)±4.2WA),其他异常则在稍后可检测到(30.3WA±6.4WA)。然后将这些结果纳入成本效益分析中。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity of fetal anomaly detection as a function of time.胎儿异常检测的敏感性与时间的关系。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:125-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08933.x.
2
Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it?决策分析能帮助我们判定胎儿异常超声筛查是否值得吗?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:154-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08936.x.
3
Managed care and ultrasound for the diagnosis of fetal anomalies.管理式医疗与超声诊断胎儿畸形
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:181-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08938.x.
4
Eurofetus: an evaluation of routine ultrasound screening for the detection of fetal defects. Aims and method.欧洲胎儿研究:对用于检测胎儿缺陷的常规超声筛查的评估。目的与方法。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:103-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08931.x.
5
Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States?胎儿超声检查降低先天性异常的成本:在美国,这些成本足以证明进行常规筛查是合理的吗?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:141-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08935.x.
6
Cost Analysis of Following Up Incomplete Low-Risk Fetal Anatomy Ultrasounds.对不完整的低风险胎儿解剖超声检查进行随访的成本分析。
Birth. 2017 Mar;44(1):35-40. doi: 10.1111/birt.12262. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team.欧洲胎儿数据库中孕期常规超声筛查的敏感性。欧洲胎儿研究团队。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18;847:118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08932.x.
8
[Determination of the sensitivity of echography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations. Methodological aspects].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1994;42(6):493-501.
9
Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.系统评价早孕期超声筛查检测胎儿结构畸形及影响筛查效能的因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):429-441. doi: 10.1002/uog.17246. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
10
Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series.用于检测胎儿异常的产前超声检查:一项前瞻性研究的结果及与既往系列研究的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Oct;165(4):943-50. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676997.