Weir M M, Bell D A, Young R H
James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories of the Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Jul;22(7):849-62. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199807000-00007.
Low-grade peritoneal serous carcinomas have been the subject of limited study, and their distinction from peritoneal serous psammocarcinomas and serous borderline tumors is not always easy. The clinicopathologic features of 14 low-grade serous carcinomas, 7 psammocarcinomas, and 19 serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin were compared. Average ages were 58 years (low-grade serous carcinomas), 48 years (borderline tumors), and 40 years (psammocarcinomas). Typical clinical presentations were abdominal pain, abdominal mass, or both, with the tumors incidental in 37% (borderline tumors), 43% (psammocarcinomas), and 36% (low-grade serous carcinoma). Operative and gross findings varied from nodules to adhesions to a dominant mass. Treatment was surgical debulking in most cases, with biopsy alone for eight borderline tumors. Seven patients with low-grade serous carcinoma were alive when last seen, but follow-up duration is short (average, 1.2 years): five were without disease, one had recurrent disease and one persistent disease. One patient with serous carcinoma died of disease at 3.5 years, and two patients died of other causes. Three patients with psammocarcinoma were alive without disease (average 3.3 years). Fourteen patients with borderline tumors were alive (average 3 years): 10 were without disease, 2 had persistent disease, and serous carcinoma developed in 2. The low-grade serous carcinomas resembled the invasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors. lacked high-grade nuclear atypia, showed tissue, lymphovascular space invasion, or both and had appreciable solid epithelial proliferation. Some serous carcinomas showed abundant psammomatous calcification suggesting psammocarcinoma but had too much epithelial proliferation for that diagnosis. The psammocarcinomas showed at least 75% psammoma bodies, no more than moderate cytological atypia, tissue or lymphovascular space invasion, or both, and rare epithelial proliferation less than 15 cells across. Adequate sampling was necessary to identify invasion, with highest yields of invasive foci in omental samples; individual foci in some cases of carcinoma resembled borderline tumor. The serous borderline tumors resembled the noninvasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors, lacked invasion, and did not show nuclear atypia of the degree seen in grade 2 or grade 3 serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma, psammocarcinoma, and serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin share some clinicopathologic features and may be underrecognized at surgery and gross examination. Because of overlapping microscopic patterns, adequate sampling is mandatory to identify small foci of invasion that exclude a borderline tumor and identify significant cellularity that excludes a psammocarcinoma. Conservative therapy is merited for younger women with borderline tumors. Maximum debulking is recommended for bulky symptomatic borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma, and psammocarcinoma. Although short-term outcomes for the carcinomas appear favorable, follow-up is too limited to determine long-term outcomes.
低级别腹膜浆液性癌的研究有限,且将其与腹膜浆液性砂粒体癌及浆液性交界性肿瘤区分开来并非总是易事。对14例低级别浆液性癌、7例砂粒体癌及19例腹膜原发性浆液性交界性肿瘤的临床病理特征进行了比较。平均年龄分别为58岁(低级别浆液性癌)、48岁(交界性肿瘤)和40岁(砂粒体癌)。典型临床表现为腹痛、腹部肿块或两者皆有,37%(交界性肿瘤)、43%(砂粒体癌)和36%(低级别浆液性癌)的肿瘤为偶然发现。手术及大体检查结果从结节到粘连再到主要肿块各不相同。大多数病例的治疗为手术减瘤,8例交界性肿瘤仅行活检。7例低级别浆液性癌患者最后一次就诊时仍存活,但随访时间较短(平均1.2年):5例无疾病,1例疾病复发,1例疾病持续存在。1例浆液性癌患者在3.5年时死于疾病,2例患者死于其他原因。3例砂粒体癌患者存活且无疾病(平均3.3年)。14例交界性肿瘤患者存活(平均3年):10例无疾病,2例疾病持续存在,2例发生了浆液性癌。低级别浆液性癌类似于卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的浸润性种植灶,缺乏高级别核异型性,可见组织、淋巴管间隙浸润或两者皆有,且有明显的实性上皮增生。一些浆液性癌可见大量砂粒体样钙化提示砂粒体癌,但上皮增生过多,无法作出该诊断。砂粒体癌显示至少75%的砂粒体,细胞学异型性不超过中度,可见组织或淋巴管间隙浸润或两者皆有,且罕见上皮增生,跨度小于15个细胞。需要充分取材以确定浸润情况,网膜样本中浸润灶的检出率最高;某些癌病例中的单个病灶类似于交界性肿瘤。浆液性交界性肿瘤类似于卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的非浸润性种植灶,无浸润,且未显示2级或3级浆液性癌所见程度的核异型性。腹膜原发性低级别浆液性癌、砂粒体癌及浆液性交界性肿瘤具有一些共同的临床病理特征,在手术及大体检查时可能未被充分认识。由于显微镜下模式重叠,必须充分取材以识别排除交界性肿瘤的小浸润灶,并识别排除砂粒体癌的显著细胞增多情况。对于年轻的交界性肿瘤女性患者,值得采用保守治疗。对于体积较大、有症状的交界性肿瘤、低级别浆液性癌及砂粒体癌,建议最大程度减瘤。尽管这些癌的短期预后似乎良好,但随访时间过于有限,无法确定长期预后。