• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻咽癌分期系统的比较。

A comparison of staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

作者信息

Cooper J S, Cohen R, Stevens R E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Medical Center, New York City 10016, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1998 Jul 15;83(2):213-9.

PMID:9669802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The fifth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual defines new rules for classifying nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The authors tested the value of this new system by applying these rules retrospectively to their previously treated patients and comparing the results with those obtained using the fourth edition of the AJCC staging manual or the Ho staging system.

METHODS

Information from 107 patients who had biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx that was treated in a constant fashion with definitive-intent radiation therapy alone at one institution provided the data base for this analysis. The extent of disease of each patient was staged according to the rules of 1) the fourth edition of the AJCC staging manual, 2) the Ho staging system, and 3) the fifth edition of the AJCC staging manual.

RESULTS

The new system appears to be better than the two previous systems. It separated patients into cohorts of more equal size than did either of the other systems. It also correlated with outcome for the study population more appropriately than did the fourth edition of the AJCC staging manual or the Ho staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

The fifth edition of the AJCC staging manual appears to be an improvement over the previous AJCC or Ho staging systems for the staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期手册第五版定义了鼻咽癌分类的新规则。作者通过将这些规则回顾性应用于他们之前治疗的患者,并将结果与使用AJCC分期手册第四版或何氏分期系统获得的结果进行比较,来测试这个新系统的价值。

方法

来自107例经活检证实为鼻咽鳞状细胞癌的患者的信息构成了本分析的数据库,这些患者在同一机构仅接受了确定性意图的放射治疗,治疗方式一致。根据以下规则对每位患者的疾病范围进行分期:1)AJCC分期手册第四版;2)何氏分期系统;3)AJCC分期手册第五版。

结果

新系统似乎比前两个系统更好。与其他两个系统相比,它将患者分成了规模更均等的队列。与AJCC分期手册第四版或何氏分期系统相比,它也更恰当地与研究人群的预后相关。

结论

AJCC分期手册第五版在鼻咽癌分期方面似乎比之前的AJCC或何氏分期系统有所改进。

相似文献

1
A comparison of staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌分期系统的比较。
Cancer. 1998 Jul 15;83(2):213-9.
2
Survival rates of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma with the new AJCC staging system.采用新美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统的鼻窦鳞状细胞癌生存率。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):131-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.2.131.
3
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma.比较第 6 版和第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统在食管癌切除患者中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.017.
4
Clinical verification of the superiority of the current International Union Against Cancer staging criteria in an Australian population of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Australas Radiol. 2004 Dec;48(4):509-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01356.x.
5
Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.
6
Prognostic factors and significance of the revised 6th edition of the AJCC classification in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.局部晚期鼻咽癌患者中美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第6版修订分类的预后因素及意义
Strahlenther Onkol. 2006 Aug;182(8):458-66. doi: 10.1007/s00066-006-1538-4.
7
Evaluation of sixth edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement.美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)鼻咽癌分期系统第六版评估及改进建议
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 15;70(4):1115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2353. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Re-evaluation of 6th edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement based on magnetic resonance imaging.鼻咽癌美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统第6版的重新评估以及基于磁共振成像的改进建议
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.062. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
9
[Influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].[磁共振成像对鼻咽癌分期系统的影响]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Feb;26(2):158-63.
10
Another way to estimate outcome of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--is concurrent chemoradiotherapy adequate?评估晚期鼻咽癌预后的另一种方法——同步放化疗是否足够?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging: from the 7th to the 9th Edition of the TNM System and Future Outlook.鼻咽癌分期的进展:从第7版到第9版TNM系统及未来展望
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar;27(3):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01651-9. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.鼻咽癌分期的演变。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190244. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190244. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
3
Prognostic value of pre-treatment F-FDG PET uptake for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.治疗前F-FDG PET摄取对鼻咽癌的预后价值。
Radiol Med. 2025 Jan;130(1):4-12. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0837-4. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
4
Prognostic value of cervical nodal tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Analysis of 1230 patients with positive cervical nodal metastasis.鼻咽癌颈部淋巴结肿瘤体积的预后价值:1230例颈部淋巴结转移阳性患者的分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176995. eCollection 2017.
5
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage IVA/IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patterns of failure in an endemic area in China.中国某流行地区IVA/IVB期鼻咽癌的调强放射治疗:临床疗效及失败模式
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Oct;190(11):993-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0680-7. Epub 2014 May 17.
6
Patterns of nodal metastasis and prognosis in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移模式及预后
Head Neck. 2014 Sep;36(9):1233-40. doi: 10.1002/hed.23438. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
7
Anti-tumor effect of oncolytic herpes simplex virus G47delta on human nasopharyngeal carcinoma.溶瘤单纯疱疹病毒G47δ对人鼻咽癌的抗肿瘤作用
Chin J Cancer. 2011 Dec;30(12):831-41. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10301. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
Current management strategy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌的现行管理策略。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar;3(1):1-12. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.1.1. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
9
Clinical application of tumor volume in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma to predict outcome.肿瘤体积在晚期鼻咽癌中的临床应用预测结局。
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Mar 11;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-20.
10
Assessment of clinical and therapeutic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal undifferentiated carcinoma.鼻咽癌未分化癌患者临床及治疗因素评估
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul-Aug;74(4):566-70. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30604-2.