Suppr超能文献

便携式呼气氢分析仪(Micro H2)与Quintron MicroLyzer在测量乳糖消化不良方面的比较,以及对Micro H2用于诊断低乳糖酶症的评估。

Comparison of a portable breath hydrogen analyser (Micro H2) with a Quintron MicroLyzer in measuring lactose maldigestion, and the evaluation of a Micro H2 for diagnosing hypolactasia.

作者信息

Peuhkuri K, Poussa T, Korpela R

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1998 May;58(3):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00365519850186607.

Abstract

The measurement of hydrogen in exhaled air and changes in the concentration of blood glucose and urine galactose excretion are indirect methods of diagnosing hypolactasia. The aim of this study was to compare a portable breath hydrogen analyser (Micro H2) with a widely used model (Quintron MicroLyzer) and to compare them with the blood glucose, urine galactose, and gastrointestinal symptoms in the lactose tolerance test. After an overnight fast, 44 volunteers (18-66 y) ingested 50 g lactose in a single oral dose. Changes in exhaled breath hydrogen concentrations were measured with the two analysers, and changes in blood glucose and urinary galactose were assayed for 4 h and used as a reference. Eighteen subjects were diagnosed as maldigesters according to our gold standard of at least two positive tests out of the three: breath hydrogen by Quintron, blood glucose concentration, and urine galactose excretion. The highest increase in the breath hydrogen concentration over the baseline was highly variable: 44-366 ppm (Micro H2) or 27-187 ppm (Quintron MicroLyzer). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Micro H2 compared to the gold standard were 83%, 96%, 94% and 89%, respectively. Overall agreement was 91% (95% CI 78-97%). Compared to the Quintron, the diagnoses were identical in 100% of the cases (92-100%). Thus, for diagnosing hypolactasia, the Micro H2 appeared as reliable for measuring breath hydrogen concentrations as Quintron MicroLyzer commonly used in oral lactose tolerance tests.

摘要

测量呼出气体中的氢气以及血糖浓度变化和尿半乳糖排泄情况是诊断乳糖不耐受的间接方法。本研究的目的是将便携式呼气氢气分析仪(Micro H2)与一种广泛使用的型号(Quintron MicroLyzer)进行比较,并将它们与乳糖耐量试验中的血糖、尿半乳糖及胃肠道症状进行比较。在禁食过夜后,44名志愿者(18 - 66岁)单次口服50克乳糖。用这两种分析仪测量呼出气体中氢气浓度的变化,并检测4小时内血糖和尿半乳糖的变化情况作为参考。根据我们的金标准,即Quintron呼气氢气、血糖浓度和尿半乳糖排泄这三项测试中至少两项呈阳性,有18名受试者被诊断为消化不良。呼气氢气浓度相对于基线的最高增加值变化很大:44 - 366 ppm(Micro H2)或27 - 187 ppm(Quintron MicroLyzer)。与金标准相比,Micro H2的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83%、96%、94%和89%。总体一致性为91%(95%可信区间78 - 97%)。与Quintron相比,100%的病例诊断结果相同(92 - 100%)。因此,对于诊断乳糖不耐受,Micro H2在测量呼气氢气浓度方面似乎与口服乳糖耐量试验中常用的Quintron MicroLyzer一样可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验