Suppr超能文献

尸检细针穿刺培养的诊断效用

Diagnostic utility of postmortem fine-needle aspiration cultures.

作者信息

Aranda M, Martí C, Bernet M, Gudiol F, Pujol R

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jul;122(7):650-5.

PMID:9674548
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microbiological cultures at autopsy have not proved to be very useful. In life, transthoracic and fine-needle aspirations of other tissues have provided better results. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic utility of postmortem cultures obtained by fine-needle aspiration puncture (FNAP) of several tissues when punctures were performed in the immediate postmortem period.

METHODS

Comparative analysis was performed between FNAP cultures and those obtained in life and by conventional autopsy. All adult autopsied patients who died at a general teaching hospital in a 3-year period were included. Clinical data, microbiological cultures before death, and pathologic data from autopsies of all patients were recorded, as were results of FNAP performed after death from the heart, right lower lung, liver, spleen, and other areas suspicious for infection. Cultures from the same sites were made at autopsy. Microorganisms were isolated and defined as infectious agents, colonizers, or contaminants according to standard criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (59 men, 33 women) were included in the study; patients had a mean age of 67.7 years. There were five main diagnostic groups: neoplastic (n = 25), digestive (n = 15), respiratory (n = 14), circulatory (n = 10), and infectious diseases (n = 10). Infection was suspected in 47 patients (51.3%). Autopsy was performed 12 hours after death or later in 61% of patients. No significant differences were found in terms of contamination or colonization in relation to time between death and FNAP, time between death and autopsy, or microorganisms isolated. The sensitivity of FNAP and autopsy with respect to the isolation of infective microorganisms was similar (80.9% vs 87%), but FNAP was more specific (66.7% vs 44.4%). Age, sex, time between death and FNAP, clinical diagnosis, cause of death, and antimicrobial therapy did not influence the results significantly. Blood cultures gave the best results (specificity 84.4%) [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

Fine-needle aspiration puncture performed in the immediate postmortem period adds relevant microbiological information to the clinicopathologic picture and provides higher specificity than autopsy cultures. Blood cultures are especially useful. When difficulties are associated with autopsy examination or in cases of selected clinical conditions, FNAP can be an effective tool for the postmortem diagnosis of infection.

摘要

背景

尸检时的微生物培养尚未证明非常有用。在生前,经胸穿刺和其他组织的细针穿刺取得了更好的结果。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估在死后即刻对多个组织进行细针穿刺抽吸(FNAP)所获得的死后培养物的诊断效用。

方法

对FNAP培养物与生前及常规尸检所获得的培养物进行比较分析。纳入了在3年期间于一家综合教学医院死亡的所有成年尸检患者。记录了所有患者的临床数据、死亡前的微生物培养结果以及尸检的病理数据,还有死后从心脏、右下肺、肝脏、脾脏及其他可疑感染部位进行FNAP的结果。在尸检时对相同部位进行培养。根据标准标准分离微生物,并将其定义为感染病原体、定植菌或污染物。

结果

92例患者(59例男性,33例女性)纳入研究;患者平均年龄为67.7岁。有五个主要诊断组:肿瘤组(n = 25)、消化系统组(n = 15)、呼吸系统组(n = 14)、循环系统组(n = 10)和传染病组(n = 10)。47例患者(51.3%)怀疑有感染。61%的患者在死亡12小时或更晚后进行尸检。在死亡与FNAP之间的时间、死亡与尸检之间的时间或分离出的微生物方面,在污染或定植方面未发现显著差异。FNAP和尸检在分离感染性微生物方面的敏感性相似(80.9%对87%),但FNAP更具特异性(66.7%对44.4%)。年龄、性别、死亡与FNAP之间的时间、临床诊断、死因和抗菌治疗对结果无显著影响。血培养结果最佳(特异性84.4%)[校正后]。

结论

在死后即刻进行的细针穿刺抽吸为临床病理情况增添了相关的微生物学信息,并且比尸检培养具有更高的特异性。血培养尤其有用。当尸检检查存在困难或在某些特定临床情况下,FNAP可成为感染性疾病死后诊断的有效工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验