Wilson S J, Wilson M L, Reller L B
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Oct;117(10):986-8.
The autopsy is receiving renewed emphasis as a tool for quality assurance in clinical medicine. Postmortem blood cultures frequently are taken during the autopsy but are costly and of unclear diagnostic utility. To assess whether postmortem blood cultures contribute any useful information not already known from antemortem blood cultures, we compared positive postmortem blood cultures taken in 111 autopsies with the results of antemortem blood cultures. Of these, 60 (54%) of 111 had positive postmortem blood cultures despite a cause of death not related to an infectious cause. Of the 111 patients, 54 (49%) had antemortem blood cultures drawn in the 7 days before death, of which 34 (63%) of 54 were negative and 20 (37%) of 54 were positive. Of the 20 patients with true antemortem bacteremia/fungemia, seven (35%) had postmortem blood cultures that yielded the same organism, 10 (50%) yielded multiple organisms that were considered to be contaminants, and three (15%) yielded different organisms. These latter three cultures yielded microorganisms that were related to the patients' illness but did not provide additional information not already known from antemortem blood cultures or the patients' clinical or autopsy findings. Of the 91 patients who had no, negative, or contaminated antemortem blood cultures, 69 (76%) had postmortem blood cultures that yielded contaminants and 22 (24%) yielded microorganisms that were indeterminate as a cause of sepsis and, therefore, did not yield new or useful information. In summary, results of postmortem blood cultures rarely, if ever, provide information that is not already known, can be interpreted, provide new insights into pathophysiology, or detect errors in therapy.
尸体解剖作为临床医学质量保证的一种工具正重新受到重视。尸检时经常进行死后血培养,但成本高昂且诊断效用不明确。为了评估死后血培养是否能提供生前血培养未知的有用信息,我们将111例尸检中的阳性死后血培养结果与生前血培养结果进行了比较。其中,111例中有60例(54%)死后血培养呈阳性,尽管死因与感染无关。111例患者中,54例(49%)在死亡前7天进行了生前血培养,其中54例中的34例(63%)为阴性,20例(37%)为阳性。在20例真正的生前菌血症/真菌血症患者中,7例(35%)死后血培养得到相同的病原体,10例(50%)得到多种被认为是污染物的病原体,3例(15%)得到不同的病原体。后三例培养所得的微生物与患者疾病相关,但未提供生前血培养、患者临床或尸检结果未知的额外信息。在91例生前血培养无、阴性或污染的患者中,69例(76%)死后血培养得到污染物,22例(24%)得到的微生物作为败血症病因无法确定,因此未产生新的或有用的信息。总之,死后血培养结果极少(如果有的话)能提供未知的、可解释的、能对病理生理学提供新见解或能检测治疗错误的信息。