Dougherty C M, Dewhurst T, Nichol W P, Spertus J
Puget Sound VA Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108-1597, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):569-75. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00028-6.
Three instruments for the assessment of quality of life, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III (QLI) were administered to 107 patients with stable angina pectoris in a longitudinal randomized trial comparing the use of alternative anginal medications in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris. This study demonstrated that differences in angina severity as measured by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) were related to each of the SAQ subscales, to selected subscales of the SF-36, but not to the QLI. All quality of life (QOL) instruments demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability when administered over a 2-week interval. Neither the SF-36 nor the QLI were discriminative of angina severity or sensitive to changes in CCSC angina classification. Both the SAQ and QLI detected changes in heart disease related QOL over time.
在一项比较使用替代抗心绞痛药物治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛的纵向随机试验中,对107例稳定型心绞痛患者使用了三种生活质量评估工具,即西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)、简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)和生活质量指数 - 心脏版III(QLI)。该研究表明,加拿大心血管学会分级(CCSC)所衡量的心绞痛严重程度差异与SAQ的各个子量表、SF - 36的选定子量表相关,但与QLI无关。当在2周的间隔内进行测量时,所有生活质量(QOL)工具都显示出可接受的重测信度。SF - 36和QLI都不能区分心绞痛严重程度,也对CCSC心绞痛分级的变化不敏感。SAQ和QLI都检测到了随时间变化的与心脏病相关的生活质量变化。