• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量和衰弱结局。

Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

D'Arcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 11;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01876-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-022-01876-w
PMID:35545790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9092884/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to report on the prospective outcomes in the areas of depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in SAVR and TAVR patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve intervention.

METHODS

We recruited 300 patients across 3 groups (TAVR, SAVR, and CABG) over 12 months. Depression, quality of life, frailty, and angina were assessed followed by propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Using logistical regression when all patient factors considered for all patients who had SAVR and TAVR, the only preoperative factors that impacted on 1 year mortality was hypertension and STS score. Quality of life improvements within each group over 12 months was significant (p value = 0.0001). Depression at 12 months between groups (p value = 0.0395) and within each group was significant (p value = 0.0073 for SAVR and 0.0001 for TAVR). Angina was most frequent in TAVR at 12 months in the QL (p = 0.0001), PL (p = 0.0007), and improvement was significant in the QL (SAVR p = 0.0010, TAVR p = 0.0001) and PL (SAVR p = 0.0002), TAVR p = 0.0007) domains in both groups. Frailty at 12 months improved in both groups, but was greatest in TAVR (p value = 0.00126).

CONCLUSIONS

This 12 months follow up of cardiac surgical patients has revealed significant improvement in PROMs and frailty in all groups by 3 months postoperative regardless of surgical or transcatheter approach. Outcome measures of quality of life and frailty could be utilized as a measure of outcome more regularly in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery regardless of approach.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是报告在接受主动脉瓣介入治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,行主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者在抑郁、生活质量、心绞痛和虚弱等方面的前瞻性结局。

方法

我们在 12 个月内招募了 300 名患者,分为 3 组(TAVR、SAVR 和 CABG)。评估抑郁、生活质量、虚弱和心绞痛,然后进行倾向评分匹配。

结果

使用逻辑回归分析所有接受 SAVR 和 TAVR 的患者的所有术前因素,唯一影响 1 年死亡率的术前因素是高血压和 STS 评分。每组患者在 12 个月内的生活质量均有显著改善(p 值=0.0001)。组间 12 个月的抑郁(p 值=0.0395)和组内抑郁(SAVR p 值=0.0073,TAVR p 值=0.0001)均有显著差异。12 个月时 TAVR 的心绞痛最常见,QL(p=0.0001)、PL(p=0.0007)均有统计学意义,QL(SAVR p=0.0010,TAVR p=0.0001)和 PL(SAVR p=0.0002,TAVR p=0.0007)均有显著改善。12 个月时,两组患者的虚弱程度均有改善,但 TAVR 组改善最大(p 值=0.00126)。

结论

本研究对心脏手术患者进行了 12 个月的随访,结果显示,无论采用外科手术还是经导管介入治疗,所有患者在术后 3 个月时 PROM 和虚弱程度均有显著改善。生活质量和虚弱程度的评估可以作为衡量主动脉瓣手术患者预后的指标,无论治疗方式如何,都可以更频繁地使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/7048859873bc/13019_2022_1876_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/bb26205dbc76/13019_2022_1876_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/3c578b12a0cf/13019_2022_1876_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/891f9055cb49/13019_2022_1876_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/c042f621f661/13019_2022_1876_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/7048859873bc/13019_2022_1876_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/bb26205dbc76/13019_2022_1876_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/3c578b12a0cf/13019_2022_1876_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/891f9055cb49/13019_2022_1876_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/c042f621f661/13019_2022_1876_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f90/9092884/7048859873bc/13019_2022_1876_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量和衰弱结局。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 11;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01876-w.
2
Comparison of the levels of depression and anxiety in elderly aortic stenosis patients treated with surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.比较手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者的抑郁和焦虑水平。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 3;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01888-6.
3
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients at Intermediate Operative Risk With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.经冠状动脉旁路移植术史的中危手术风险患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局比较:SURTAVI 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):810-814. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1856.
4
A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.中高危手术患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较研究:医院结局和中期结果
Heart Surg Forum. 2019 Aug 27;22(5):E331-E339. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2243.
5
Preoperative frailty affects postoperative complications, exercise capacity, and home discharge rates after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.术前衰弱会影响手术后并发症、运动能力和经手术及经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的家庭出院率。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Aug;36(8):1234-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01793-3. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
6
Clinical Outcomes in Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An ANZSCTS Database Review 2001-2019.2001-2019 年澳大利亚和新西兰胸心血管外科协会数据库回顾:手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换的临床结局。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1153-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.04.047. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Contemporary Costs Associated With Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术相关的当代成本。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;15(3):e011295. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011295. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Comparison of Short and Mid-Term Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (Intermediate/High Risk) Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.对比行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(中危/高危)患者的短期及中期死亡率和发病率。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Apr 15;23(2):E212-E220. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2913.
10
In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in younger patients less than 75 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.75 岁以下年轻患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的院内转归:倾向评分匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):50-57. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01051.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of frailty, mental health, and cardiac function on quality of life in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.衰弱、心理健康和心脏功能对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者生活质量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04859-8.
2
Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement align survival with general population expectations: insights from standardized mortality ratios.外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术使生存率与普通人群预期相符:来自标准化死亡比的见解。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 11;12:1547456. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1547456. eCollection 2025.
3
Quality of life and functional capacity in patients after cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpretation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care: A Review.西雅图心绞痛问卷解读作为临床试验和临床护理中的结局指标:综述。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):593-599. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7478.
2
Modified essential frailty toolset to determine outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.改良基本脆弱性工具包以确定经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局。
J Cardiol. 2021 Apr;77(4):341-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
3
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.
心脏手术后重症监护病房患者的生活质量和功能能力
World J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):436-447. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i8.436.
4
Frailty and Cardiovascular Health.虚弱与心血管健康。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 6;13(15):e031736. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031736. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
Sarcopenia and aortic valve disease.肌肉减少症与主动脉瓣疾病。
Heart. 2024 Jul 10;110(15):974-979. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324029.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的长期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52550. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Mental health and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A scoping systematic review.精神健康与经导管主动脉瓣置换术:范围性系统综述。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Jan-Feb;86:10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.11.009. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
8
Surgical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients over 75 years with aortic stenosis: sociodemographic profile, clinical characteristics, quality of life and functionality.75 岁以上主动脉瓣狭窄患者的外科经导管主动脉瓣置换术:社会人口统计学特征、临床特征、生活质量和功能。
PeerJ. 2023 Sep 20;11:e16102. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16102. eCollection 2023.
9
Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣狭窄研究中的生活质量测量:叙事性综述。
Cardiology. 2023;148(6):556-570. doi: 10.1159/000531465. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
10
Demystifying the Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Context.解读心胸外科背景下最小临床重要差异的价值
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;13(3):716. doi: 10.3390/life13030716.
经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
4
A novel geriatric assessment frailty score predicts 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.一种新的老年综合评估衰弱评分可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 2 年的死亡率。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):153-160. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy044.
5
Depression Screening in Cardiac Surgery Patients.心脏外科患者的抑郁筛查。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Jun;28(6):953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.04.298. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Validation of the Seattle angina questionnaire in women with ischemic heart disease.验证西雅图心绞痛问卷在缺血性心脏病女性患者中的应用。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.老年主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱:FRAILTY-AVR 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
8
Investigating the collection and assessment of patient-reported outcome data amongst unplanned surgical hospital admissions: a feasibility study.探究非计划性外科住院患者报告结局数据的收集与评估:一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 May 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0011-5. eCollection 2015.
9
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: why should we measure them and which instruments should we use?心脏瓣膜手术患者的患者报告结局指标(PROMS):我们为何要进行测量以及应使用哪些工具?
Open Heart. 2016 May 5;3(1):e000315. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000315. eCollection 2016.
10
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.