Trauer T, Duckmanton R A, Chiu E
Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1998 Summer;44(2):79-91. doi: 10.1177/002076409804400201.
As part of a larger study, the Lehman Quality of Life Interview (QOLI) was conducted a total of 85 times with 55 clients with serious mental illness. Results revealed widespread adverse objective circumstances (unemployment, poverty and social isolation) despite which most clients rated their satisfaction levels about average (about equally satisfied and dissatisfied). As expected, subjective quality of life indicators were generally better predictors of global well-being (GWB) (itself based on subjective ratings) than were objective indicators. Correlations between objective and subjective indicators were very low and insignificant. Moderate relationships were found between GWB and levels of personal functioning, and changes in levels of personal functioning, as rated by mental health workers. Retests showed that subjective quality of life was relatively stable over intervals of several months. The findings suggest that leisure and social relations would be suitable areas for interventions that might improve clients' quality of life.
作为一项规模更大研究的一部分，对55名患有严重精神疾病的客户总共进行了85次雷曼生活质量访谈（QOLI）。结果显示存在广泛的不利客观情况（失业、贫困和社会隔离），尽管如此，大多数客户对其满意度的评价约为平均水平（满意和不满意程度大致相同）。正如预期的那样，主观生活质量指标通常比客观指标更能预测总体幸福感（GWB）（其本身基于主观评分）。客观指标与主观指标之间的相关性非常低且不显著。心理健康工作者评定的总体幸福感与个人功能水平以及个人功能水平的变化之间存在中等程度的关系。重新测试表明，主观生活质量在几个月的时间间隔内相对稳定。研究结果表明，休闲和社会关系可能是适合进行干预以改善客户生活质量的领域。
