• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets.乳腺癌风险及筛查益处如何传达给女性：对58份宣传册的分析
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):263-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263.
2
[What kind of information do German health information pamphlets provide on mammography screening?].[德国乳腺X线筛查健康信息手册提供了哪些信息？]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003 Feb;97(1):53-7.
3
Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women.乳腺癌筛查宣传册误导女性。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 25;348:g2636. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2636.
4
Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.公共资助的乳腺钼靶筛查的邀请内容。
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):538-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.538.
5
Breast screening: the facts--or maybe not.乳房筛查：事实——或许并非如此。
BMJ. 2009 Jan 27;338:b86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b86.
6
'Controversy'. Propaganda versus evidence based health promotion: the case of breast screening.“争议”。宣传与循证健康促进：以乳腺癌筛查为例
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1999 Oct-Dec;14(4):329-34. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199910/12)14:4<329::AID-HPM561>3.0.CO;2-P.
7
Information leaflets.信息手册。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(1):3-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200102.
8
Efficacy of a simple, low-cost educational intervention in improving knowledge about risks and benefits of screening mammography.一项简单、低成本的教育干预措施在提高乳腺钼靶筛查风险和益处相关知识方面的效果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jun;81(6):783-91. doi: 10.4065/81.6.783.
9
Life and Death. It is not wrong to say no.生与死。说“不”并没有错。
BMJ. 2009 Jun 23;338:b2529. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2529.
10
The impact of distribution of a patient-education pamphlet in a multidisciplinary breast clinic.患者教育手册在多学科乳腺诊所的分发影响
J Cancer Educ. 1996 Fall;11(3):148-52. doi: 10.1080/08858199609528418.

引用本文的文献

1
Questioning 'Informed Choice' in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context.质疑医学筛查中的“知情选择”：新自由主义修辞、文化和社会背景的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;11(9):1230. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091230.
2
To Consent or Not to Consent to Screening, That Is the Question.同意还是不同意筛查，这是个问题。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(7):982. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070982.
3
How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.英国网站如何传达宫颈癌筛查信息？内容和定量呈现格式的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e029551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029551.
4
Women's perception, attitudes, and intended behavior towards predictive epigenetic risk testing for female cancers in 5 European countries: a cross-sectional online survey.5 个欧洲国家女性对女性癌症预测性表观遗传学风险检测的认知、态度和预期行为：一项跨欧洲国家的在线横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6994-8.
5
Bring on the Machines: Could Machine Learning Improve the Quality of Patient Education Materials? A Systematic Search and Rapid Review.引入机器：机器学习能否提高患者教育材料的质量？系统检索与快速综述
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-16. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00010.
6
What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries.欧洲女性对自身患癌风险及癌症筛查了解多少？一项针对五个欧洲国家的横断面在线干预调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 28;8(12):e023789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023789.
7
Online information about risks and benefits of screening mammography in 10 European countries: An observational Web sites analysis.10个欧洲国家乳腺钼靶筛查的风险与益处的在线信息：一项观察性网站分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10957. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010957.
8
Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians' non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations.事实能胜过无条件的信任吗？基于证据的信息会使医生基于非证据的癌症筛查建议的影响力减半。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183024. eCollection 2017.
9
Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.关于乳腺钼靶筛查证据与争议的个性化知情选择：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3428-9.
10
Scarce information about breast cancer screening: An Italian websites analysis.关于乳腺癌筛查的信息匮乏：一项意大利网站分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5615. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005615.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical hubris and the public health: the ethical dimension.医学傲慢与公共卫生：伦理维度
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;49(6):619-21. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00039-x.
2
A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.一项关于风险评估及反馈对乳腺钼靶筛查参与率影响的随机试验。
Prev Med. 1993 May;22(3):350-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1993.1029.
3
Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews.循证采购：理解临床试验和系统评价的结果
BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1056-9; discussion 1059-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1056.
4
Breast screening: time for a rethink?乳房筛查：是时候重新思考了吗？
BMJ. 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1153-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1153.
5
Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed?女性与乳腺癌：公众真的有可能充分了解相关信息吗？
CMAJ. 1992 Jun 15;146(12):2147-8.

How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets.

作者信息

Slaytor E K, Ward J E

机构信息

Needs Assessment and Health Outcomes Unit, Central Sydney Area Health Service, Locked Bag 8, Newtown, 2042, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):263-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263
PMID:9677220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC28619/
Abstract
摘要