Thomas S, Fisher B, Fram P J, Waring M J
Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory, Bridgend, UK.
J Wound Care. 1998 May;7(5):246-50. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1998.7.5.246.
This study uses an objective test system that compares the ability of different dressings to prevent the passage of a volatile amine when applied to a wound model under simulated 'in-use' conditions. Five dressings containing activated charcoal were tested by this method, and a low-adherent absorbent dressing was used as a control. Results demonstrate clear differences in the ability of the products to contain the test solution and prevent the loss of the volatile diethylamine into the surrounding air. Products which combine a physical absorbent with a charcoal component show enhanced performance.