Swick H M
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City 66160-7300, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Jul;73(7):751-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199807000-00010.
Academic medicine faces unprecedented challenges, especially the impact of the changing and more business-oriented health care system on medical education. There is an inherent clash of values between business and medicine: among key business values are profit and competition, while among the traditional values of the medical profession are service, advocacy, and altruism. Business interests have already gained a central place in medicine, so the challenge has become how to utilize the positive elements of the entrepreneurial spirit to enhance professional values and advance academic medicine's central enterprise. The author maintains that to achieve that synthesis, the leaders of academic medicine must continue to engage in a dialogue with the broader academic community, the government, the public, and the health care industry. The dialogue must emphasize (1) managing change rather than resisting it (such as focusing on the positive aspects of change, keeping sight of the fundamental professional values of medicine and medical education, and maintaining cool, rational judgment in the face of challenges); (2) making academic medicine's case with many constituencies, such as the health care industry, government, and the public; and (3) fostering professionalism by increasing medical schools' emphasis on this task, by ensuring that schools keep an appropriate balance between the science and the art of medicine, and by having faculty model appropriate professional values for their students. The author concludes that while change inevitably brings challenge and a sense of loss, it also brings the opportunity to help reshape medical education to meet the needs of society.
学术医学面临着前所未有的挑战,尤其是不断变化且更具商业导向的医疗保健系统对医学教育的影响。商业与医学之间存在着内在的价值观冲突:商业的关键价值观包括利润和竞争,而医学专业的传统价值观包括服务、倡导和利他主义。商业利益在医学中已经占据了核心地位,因此挑战已变成如何利用企业家精神的积极因素来强化专业价值观并推动学术医学的核心事业。作者认为,为实现这种融合,学术医学的领导者必须继续与更广泛的学术团体、政府、公众和医疗保健行业进行对话。这种对话必须强调:(1)管理变革而非抵制变革(例如关注变革的积极方面,牢记医学和医学教育的基本专业价值观,并在面对挑战时保持冷静、理性的判断);(2)向医疗保健行业、政府和公众等众多群体阐明学术医学的情况;(3)通过提高医学院校对此任务的重视程度、确保学校在医学的科学与艺术之间保持适当平衡以及让教师为学生树立恰当的专业价值观来培养专业精神。作者总结道,虽然变革不可避免地带来挑战和失落感,但它也带来了重塑医学教育以满足社会需求的机会。