Leeper D B, Engin K, Wang J H, Cater J R, Li D J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5097, USA.
Int J Hyperthermia. 1998 May-Jun;14(3):257-69. doi: 10.3109/02656739809018231.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous or combined intravenous plus oral glucose administration was more effective inducing acute tumour acidification. Seventeen nondiabetic patients at the Henan Tumour Hospital with superficial tumour deposits of various histologies and size were administered, after fasting, either 50 g glucose intravenously (i.v., in 100 ml over 10 min) or 50 g i.v. glucose (in 100 ml over 10 min) combined with 100 g oral glucose (in 200 ml; i.v. + oral). Extracellular tumour pH (pHe) was determined with one or two indwelling needle combination pH microelectrodes. Blood glucose concentration was determined every 15-20 min by finger stick with Chem-Strips and a Glucometer. Ten patients received i.v. glucose, and seven patients received i.v. + oral glucose. Blood glucose rose to 430 +/- 15 mg/dL in both groups. However, the rate of clearance of blood glucose was greater for the i.v. glucose than for the i.v. + oral glucose group (p < 0.00002), and thus the blood glucose levels remained elevated longer after i.v. + oral than after i.v. glucose administration. Relative to the initial fasting blood glucose concentration, blood glucose was -2 +/- 7 mg/dL at 110 min after glucose administration by the i.v. route, whereas, blood glucose relative to initial values was 143 + 23 mg/dL by 110 min after glucose administration by the i.v. + oral route, p = 0.000004. The initial pHe values in the two groups of tumours were similar, 7.34 +/- 0.09 (6.78-7.71) and 7.35 +/- 0.08 (6.99-7.61), respectively. After i.v. glucose, tumour acidification occurred in nine of ten patients (-0.16 + 0.02 pH unit, range -0.24 to -0.05), and after i.v. + oral glucose tumour acidification occurred in six of seven patients (-0.19 +/- 0.07 pH unit, range -0.43 to -0.06). When the initial fasting blood glucose concentration was in excess of 82 mg/dL, all patients (12/12) exhibited tumour acidification during hyperglycaemia, whereas, only 3/5 patients exhibited tumour acidification when the initial blood glucose concentration was less than 82 mg/dL (p = 0.07). The time to maximum decrease in tumour pHe was significantly shorter after i.v. + oral glucose than after i.v. glucose (e.g., 67 +/- 11 versus 102 +/- 8 min, p = 0.02) and correlated with the rate of clearance of blood glucose (p = 0.02, r = 0.55). Larger tumours tended to exhibit a greater decrease in pHe (p = 0.08, r = 0.04). The only side effects of hyperglycaemia were transient nausea and increased urinary output. The effect of hyperglycaemia induced by administration of 200 g oral glucose was similar to i.v. administration in that 83% of tumours exhibited acidification of 0.14 +/- 0.02 pH unit by 91 +/- 7 min. We conclude that i.v. and i.v. + oral glucose administration are equally effective inducing tumour acute acidification, but no more effective than 200 g oral glucose, for investigation of hyperglycemic sensitization to thermoradiotherapy.
本研究的目的是确定静脉注射葡萄糖或静脉联合口服葡萄糖给药在诱导急性肿瘤酸化方面是否更有效。河南肿瘤医院的17例非糖尿病患者,患有不同组织学类型和大小的浅表肿瘤沉积物,禁食后,分别静脉注射50 g葡萄糖(100 ml,10分钟内注射完毕)或静脉注射50 g葡萄糖(100 ml,10分钟内注射完毕)联合口服100 g葡萄糖(200 ml;静脉注射+口服)。用一根或两根留置针组合pH微电极测定细胞外肿瘤pH值(pHe)。每隔15 - 20分钟用血糖仪和化学试纸通过手指采血测定血糖浓度。10例患者接受静脉注射葡萄糖,7例患者接受静脉注射+口服葡萄糖。两组血糖均升至430±15 mg/dL。然而,静脉注射葡萄糖组的血糖清除率高于静脉注射+口服葡萄糖组(p < 0.00002),因此静脉注射+口服葡萄糖后血糖水平升高的持续时间比静脉注射葡萄糖后更长。相对于初始空腹血糖浓度,静脉注射葡萄糖给药后110分钟时血糖为-2±7 mg/dL,而静脉注射+口服葡萄糖给药后110分钟时相对于初始值血糖为143 + 23 mg/dL,p = 0.000004。两组肿瘤的初始pHe值相似,分别为7.34±0.09(6.78 - 7.71)和7.35±0.08(6.99 - 7.61)。静脉注射葡萄糖后,10例患者中有9例出现肿瘤酸化(-0.16 + 0.02 pH单位,范围-0.24至-0.05),静脉注射+口服葡萄糖后,7例患者中有6例出现肿瘤酸化(-0.19±0.07 pH单位,范围-0.43至-0.06)。当初始空腹血糖浓度超过82 mg/dL时,所有患者(12/12)在高血糖期间均出现肿瘤酸化,而当初始血糖浓度低于82 mg/dL时,只有3/5的患者出现肿瘤酸化(p = 0.07)。静脉注射+口服葡萄糖后肿瘤pHe最大下降时间明显短于静脉注射葡萄糖后(例如,67±11分钟对102±8分钟,p = 0.02),且与血糖清除率相关(p = 0.02,r = 0.55)。较大的肿瘤往往pHe下降幅度更大(p = 0.08,r = 0.04)。高血糖的唯一副作用是短暂的恶心和尿量增加。口服200 g葡萄糖诱导的高血糖效应与静脉注射相似,即91±7分钟时83%的肿瘤出现酸化,酸化程度为0.14±0.02 pH单位。我们得出结论,静脉注射葡萄糖和静脉注射+口服葡萄糖给药在诱导肿瘤急性酸化方面同样有效,但对于研究高血糖对热放疗的敏感性,并不比口服200 g葡萄糖更有效。