• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动部分在创伤分诊中的效能。

Efficacy of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale in trauma triage.

作者信息

Ross S E, Leipold C, Terregino C, O'Malley K F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cooper Health Systems, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):42-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199807000-00008
PMID:9680010
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National guidelines recommend that patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of less than 14 be triaged to trauma centers. We hypothesized that the motor component of the GCS (GCSM) would be equally sensitive as the total GCS in head injury triage.

METHODS

A 2-year retrospective review of 3,235 injured adults transported directly to a Level I trauma center.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred ten patients (44%) had prehospital GCS scores recorded. GCSM was found to have a sensitivity of 0.90 for Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score = 5 head injury and 0.61 for AIS score > 3 injury, whereas the GCS had sensitivities of 0.92 and 0.62, respectively (p = not significant). Specificities were equal at 0.85 for AIS score = 5 and 0.89 for AIS score > 3.

CONCLUSION

GCSM is equivalent to GCS for prehospital triage, and in view of its simplicity it should replace the GCS in triage schemes.

摘要

背景

国家指南建议,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低于14分的患者应被分诊至创伤中心。我们假设,在头部损伤分诊中,GCS的运动部分(GCSM)与GCS总分具有同等的敏感性。

方法

对直接转运至一级创伤中心的3235名成年伤者进行为期2年的回顾性研究。

结果

1410名患者(44%)有院前GCS评分记录。发现GCSM对简明损伤定级(AIS)评分为5分的头部损伤敏感性为0.90,对AIS评分>3分的损伤敏感性为0.61,而GCS的敏感性分别为0.92和0.62(p=无显著性差异)。AIS评分为5分时特异性均为0.85,AIS评分>3分时特异性为0.89。

结论

GCSM在院前分诊中与GCS等效,鉴于其简单性,在分诊方案中应取代GCS。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale in trauma triage.格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动部分在创伤分诊中的效能。
J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):42-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00008.
2
Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale.基于证据的国家创伤分诊协议改进:格拉斯哥昏迷评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分运动子量表。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):95-102; discussion 101-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000280.
3
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
4
Prehospital Versus Trauma Center Glasgow Coma Scale in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.院前与创伤中心格拉斯哥昏迷评分在小儿颅脑损伤患者中的比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
A Two-Center Validation of "Patient Does Not Follow Commands" and Three Other Simplified Measures to Replace the Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Trauma Triage.“患者不遵医嘱”与其他三种简化措施的双中心验证,以替代格拉斯哥昏迷评分用于现场创伤分诊。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):259-269. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.038. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
The Whole is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts: GCS Versus GCS-Motor for Triage in Geriatric Trauma.整体大于部分之和:GCS 与 GCS-运动评分用于老年创伤患者分诊。
J Surg Res. 2021 May;261:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.051. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
Using the abbreviated injury severity and Glasgow Coma Scale scores to predict 2-week mortality after traumatic brain injury.使用简明损伤定级标准和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分预测创伤性脑损伤后2周死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1172-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822b0f4b.
8
Modification of Glasgow Coma Scale criteria for injured elders.修订格拉斯哥昏迷评分标准用于评估老年伤者。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(10):1014-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01164.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
9
Initial emergency department trauma scores from the OPALS study: the case for the motor score in blunt trauma.OPALS研究中急诊科最初的创伤评分:钝性创伤中运动评分的依据
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;11(8):834-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb00764.x.
10
Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component ("Patient Does Not Follow Commands") Performs Similarly to Total Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Severe Injury in Trauma Patients.格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动部分(“患者不遵嘱”)在预测创伤患者严重损伤方面与格拉斯哥昏迷量表总分表现相似。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;68(6):744-750.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective analysis.开发并验证预测急性严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的列线图:一项回顾性分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Oct;45(10):4931-4956. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07572-y. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score Predicts Need for Tracheostomy After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury.格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动评分可预测创伤性脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术后气管切开的需求。
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 Nov 6;19(4):454-465. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e53. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Effect of Acupuncture on Recovery of Consciousness in Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.
针刺对急性创伤性脑损伤患者意识恢复的影响:一项多机构队列研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(16):2267. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162267.
4
Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score.诊断意识水平:格拉斯哥昏迷量表总分的局限性。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3295-3305. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0199.
5
The Whole is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts: GCS Versus GCS-Motor for Triage in Geriatric Trauma.整体大于部分之和:GCS 与 GCS-运动评分用于老年创伤患者分诊。
J Surg Res. 2021 May;261:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.051. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
Interrater Reliability of Four Neurological Scales for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.急诊科患者四种神经学量表的评分者间信度
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;24(12):1198-1200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23603.
7
Effect of Age on Glasgow Coma Scale in Patients with Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Approach with Propensity Score-Matched Population.年龄对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表的影响:倾向评分匹配人群研究方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 13;14(11):1378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111378.
8
Functional resting-state fMRI connectivity correlates with serum levels of the S100B protein in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury.在创伤性脑损伤急性期,静息态功能磁共振成像功能连接性与血清S100B蛋白水平相关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 May 9;12:1004-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.005. eCollection 2016.
9
The Estimated Verbal GCS Subscore in Intubated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: Is it Really Better?气管插管的创伤性脑损伤患者的估计言语格拉斯哥昏迷量表分项评分:它真的更好吗?
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Apr 15;34(8):1603-1609. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4657. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Head Injury- A Maxillofacial Surgeon's Perspective.头部损伤——颌面外科医生的视角
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):ZE01-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16112.7122. Epub 2016 Jan 1.