Suppr超能文献

白内障手术技术导致的内皮损伤。

Endothelial damage with cataract surgery techniques.

作者信息

Díaz-Valle D, Benítez del Castillo Sánchez J M, Castillo A, Sayagués O, Moriche M

机构信息

Departmet of Ophthalmology, Hospital General de Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jul;24(7):951-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80049-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraoperative endothelial damage after planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with difference capsulotomy techniques and phacoemulsification.

SETTING

San Carlos University Hospital, Castroviejo Institute, Madrid, Spain.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized study, 60 patients with senile cataract scheduled for cataract surgery were divided into three groups of 20 each: Group 1 had phacoemulsification; Group 2, planned ECCE with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis; and Group 3, ECCE with letter-box capsulotomy. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, endothelial cell density, percentage of hexagonality, and the cell size variation coefficient were determined by contact specular microscopy; endothelial permeability was examined by anterior segment fluorophotometry and central corneal thickness, by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results were analyzed using the two-tailed Student's t-test and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

In all three groups, endothelial permeability and cell loss increased significantly from the preoperative values, but there were not significant differences among the postoperative values. Mean cell loss was 11.8% in Group 1, 12.8% in Group 2, and 10.1% in Group 3. There were no differences between the preoperative and postoperative morphometric indexes. Postoperative pachymetric measurements were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial response was not statistically significantly different among the surgical techniques, although endothelial damage was lower in Group 3, which could indicate a protective effect of the anterior capsule during cataract extraction. Endothelial barrier function remained disturbed despite the apparent morphological stabilization.

摘要

目的

评估采用不同撕囊技术的计划性囊外白内障摘除术(ECCE)和超声乳化白内障吸除术后的术中内皮损伤情况。

设置

西班牙马德里圣卡洛斯大学医院卡斯特罗维霍研究所。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,60例计划接受白内障手术的老年白内障患者被分为三组,每组20例:第1组行超声乳化白内障吸除术;第2组行采用连续环形撕囊的计划性ECCE;第3组行信箱式撕囊的ECCE。术前及术后3个月,通过接触式镜面显微镜检查确定内皮细胞密度、六角形细胞百分比和细胞大小变异系数;通过眼前节荧光光度法检查内皮通透性,通过超声测厚法测量中央角膜厚度。采用双尾学生t检验和方差分析对结果进行分析。

结果

在所有三组中,内皮通透性和细胞丢失均较术前值显著增加,但术后值之间无显著差异。第1组平均细胞丢失率为11.8%,第2组为12.8%,第3组为10.1%。术前和术后形态学指标无差异。术后测厚测量无显著差异。

结论

尽管第3组内皮损伤较低,这可能表明白内障摘除术中前囊膜有保护作用,但不同手术技术之间的内皮反应在统计学上无显著差异。尽管形态学上明显稳定,但内皮屏障功能仍受到干扰。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验