Jarr S, Henderson M L, Henley C
Critical Care Services, University of North Carolina Hospitals, USA.
J Nurs Care Qual. 1998 Aug;12(6):26-36. doi: 10.1097/00001786-199808000-00007.
The driving force behind mandates from both the American Nurses' Association and the American Medical Association is an expectation that doctors and nurses will act as advocates for the participation of the patient in end-of-life treatment decisions. This mandate assumes that both groups are knowledgeable about advance directives and can advise patients on these. Both groups are enjoined not only to facilitate the expression of the patient's wishes but also scrupulously to honor these. The literature suggests that, despite their professional mandate, nurses may feel uncertain about the legal, moral, and ethical obligations surrounding their participation in this enormously significant aspect of patient care. This study focuses on the perception of the dilemma by a sample of registered nurses at a large southeastern university medical center.
美国护士协会和美国医学协会发布指令背后的推动力在于,期望医生和护士能作为倡导者,推动患者参与临终治疗决策。这一指令假定这两个群体都了解预立医疗指示,并能就此向患者提供建议。这两个群体不仅被要求协助表达患者的意愿,还必须严格尊重这些意愿。文献表明,尽管有专业指令,但护士对于围绕其参与这一极其重要的患者护理方面所涉及的法律、道德和伦理义务,可能会感到不确定。本研究聚焦于一所位于东南部的大型大学医学中心的注册护士样本对这一困境的认知。