Patel R S, Rao S S
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1998 Aug;275(2):G187-91. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.275.2.G187.
The biomechanical and sensory characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and those of the striated and smooth muscle portions of the esophagus have not been compared in humans. Our aim was to determine sensory perception, cross-sectional area (CSA), and biomechanical parameters at different levels of the esophagus. We studied 11 healthy volunteers, using impedance planimetry. Intermittent balloon distensions (5-60 cmH2O) were performed at four sites: 1) the LES, 2) 5 cm above LES (distal), 3) 10 cm above LES (mid), and 4) 5 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter (proximal). During these distensions, CSAs, biomechanical parameters, and sensory responses were measured. The mid-esophagus had a higher (P < 0.05) CSA than the distal esophagus. The LES had the smallest CSA (P < 0.05). The LES and the proximal esophagus had greater (P < 0.05) wall tension and were less (P < 0.05) deformable than the mid- or distal esophagus. Sensory thresholds were lower (P < 0.05) in the proximal compared with the mid- or distal esophagus. Biomechanical and sensory parameters are not uniform along the length of the esophagus. The striated muscle portion is more sensitive and less compliant than the smooth muscle portion. These differences could affect the results of balloon distension tests of the esophagus.
尚未在人体中比较食管下括约肌(LES)以及食管横纹肌和平滑肌部分的生物力学和感觉特性。我们的目的是确定食管不同水平的感觉感知、横截面积(CSA)和生物力学参数。我们使用阻抗平面测量法研究了11名健康志愿者。在四个部位进行间歇性球囊扩张(5 - 60 cmH₂O):1)LES,2)LES上方5 cm(远端),3)LES上方10 cm(中部),4)食管上括约肌下方5 cm(近端)。在这些扩张过程中,测量CSA、生物力学参数和感觉反应。食管中部的CSA高于远端食管(P < 0.05)。LES的CSA最小(P < 0.05)。LES和食管近端的壁张力更大(P < 0.05),与食管中部或远端相比,其可变形性更小(P < 0.05)。与食管中部或远端相比,近端的感觉阈值更低(P < 0.05)。沿食管长度方向,生物力学和感觉参数并不一致。横纹肌部分比平滑肌部分更敏感且顺应性更低。这些差异可能会影响食管球囊扩张试验的结果。