• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用医院绩效数据进行质量改进:克利夫兰健康质量选择项目的经验

Using hospital performance data in quality improvement: the Cleveland Health Quality Choice experience.

作者信息

Rosenthal G E, Hammar P J, Way L E, Shipley S A, Doner D, Wojtala B, Miller J, Harper D L

机构信息

Institute for Health Care Research, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jul;24(7):347-60. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30386-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30386-8
PMID:9689568
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cleveland Health Quality Choice is a regional initiative to assess hospital performance which was implemented in 1989. The project developed and validated CHOICE, a severity adjustment system that includes diagnosis-specific models for medical, surgical, and obstetrical patients which are based on clinical data abstracted from patients' medical records.

METHODOLOGY

Since 1992 Cleveland Health Quality Choice has disseminated semi-annual reports that profile hospital mortality rates, lengths of stay, and cesarean section rates using the CHOICE severity adjustment models. Hospitals receive tabular and graphical representations of hospital outcomes and electronic patient-level data files that can be used to further examine outcomes in clinical subgroups.

RESULTS

Four case studies illustrate how outcomes data derived from the CHOICE models led to the development of successful hospital programs to decrease lengths of stay, cesarean section rates, and hospital mortality rates. Although each case study reflected a unique approach to process improvement, several common characteristics were observed: (1) establishment of interdisciplinary process improvement teams with senior physician and nursing leadership; (2) detailed review of the process of care to identify modifiable clinical practices likely to affect outcomes; (3) development of practice guidelines based on group consensus or published recommendations that were designed to affect modifiable practices; and (4) aggressive sharing of serial data with individual practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Although outcomes data can provide powerful insight on where to target quality improvement efforts, hospitals must identify influential and modifiable clinical practices. Such efforts are most likely to be successful if driven by interdisciplinary work groups, supported by senior clinicians and administrators, and based on locally accepted practice standards.

摘要

背景

克利夫兰健康质量选择计划是一项评估医院绩效的区域性倡议,于1989年实施。该项目开发并验证了CHOICE,这是一种严重程度调整系统,包括针对内科、外科和产科患者的特定诊断模型,这些模型基于从患者病历中提取的临床数据。

方法

自1992年以来,克利夫兰健康质量选择计划每半年发布一次报告,使用CHOICE严重程度调整模型概述医院死亡率、住院时间和剖宫产率。医院会收到医院结果的表格和图形表示以及电子患者层面的数据文件,这些文件可用于进一步检查临床亚组的结果。

结果

四个案例研究说明了从CHOICE模型得出的结果数据如何促成了成功的医院项目,以缩短住院时间、降低剖宫产率和医院死亡率。尽管每个案例研究都反映了一种独特的流程改进方法,但仍观察到几个共同特征:(1)建立由资深医生和护士领导的跨学科流程改进团队;(2)详细审查护理过程,以确定可能影响结果的可修改临床实践;(3)根据小组共识或已发表的建议制定实践指南,旨在影响可修改的实践;(4)积极与个体从业者共享系列数据。

结论

尽管结果数据可以为质量改进工作的目标提供有力见解,但医院必须识别有影响力且可修改的临床实践。如果由跨学科工作组推动,得到资深临床医生和管理人员的支持,并基于当地认可的实践标准,这些努力最有可能取得成功。

相似文献

1
Using hospital performance data in quality improvement: the Cleveland Health Quality Choice experience.利用医院绩效数据进行质量改进:克利夫兰健康质量选择项目的经验
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jul;24(7):347-60. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30386-8.
2
Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment.克利夫兰健康质量选择:一种基于社区合作的结果评估模式。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):425-42. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30088-8.
3
Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice.使用基于生理学的预后指标对重症监护结果进行全社区评估:克利夫兰健康质量选择对重症监护服务的影响
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):793-801. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.3.793.
4
Expanding a performance improvement initiative in critical care from hospital to system.将重症监护领域的绩效改进计划从医院层面扩展至系统层面。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Aug;28(8):419-34. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28042-6.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC)--an ongoing collaborative, community-based outcomes assessment program.克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)——一个正在进行的基于社区合作的结果评估项目。
New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):321-5.
7
The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
Qual Manag Health Care. 1999 Winter;7(2):1-10. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199907020-00001.
8
Cardiovascular outcomes initiative: case studies in performance improvement.
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):110-5; quiz 115-6.
9
Volume, quality of care, and outcome in pneumonia.肺炎的容量、护理质量与结局
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 21;144(4):262-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-4-200602210-00008.
10
Length of stay as a source of bias in comparing performance in VA and private sector facilities: lessons learned from a regional evaluation of intensive care outcomes.在比较退伍军人事务部(VA)设施和私营部门设施的绩效时,住院时间作为偏差来源:从重症监护结果的区域评估中吸取的教训。
Med Care. 2001 Sep;39(9):1014-24. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00011.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with the effectiveness of immersive virtual therapy in alleviating depressive symptoms during sub-acute post-stroke rehabilitation: a gender comparison.亚急性卒中后康复期间沉浸式虚拟疗法缓解抑郁症状有效性的相关因素:一项性别比较
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 20;15(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00742-z.
2
Evaluation, Description and Magnitude of Readmission Phenomenon in Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP) for Chronic-Degenerative Diseases in the Period 2018-2021.2018 - 2021年期间比萨大学医院(AOUP)慢性退行性疾病再入院现象的评估、描述及程度
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;11(5):651. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050651.
3
Impact of public release of performance data on the behaviour of healthcare consumers and providers.
医疗绩效数据公开对医疗消费者和提供者行为的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 6;9(9):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub3.
4
Competitive Strategy for Successful National University Hospital Management in the Republic of Korea.韩国国立大学医院成功管理的竞争战略
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016 Jun;7(3):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.公开绩效数据对改变医疗保健消费者、专业人员或组织的行为所产生的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub2.
6
Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement.质量测量编码:从质量测量角度看医院结构特征与编码准确性之间的关系
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2007 Apr 16;4:3.
7
Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement.利用患者满意度公开报告促进医院质量改进。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):663-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00508.x.
8
Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.关于用于收集医院患者护理感知数据的调查工具的文献综述。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1996-2017. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00475.x.
9
Are diagnosis specific outcome indicators based on administrative data useful in assessing quality of hospital care?基于行政数据的诊断特异性结局指标在评估医院医疗质量方面是否有用?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Feb;13(1):32-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003996.
10
Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?老年患者比年轻患者对医院护理更满意吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):23-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20114.x.