• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克利夫兰健康质量选择:一种基于社区合作的结果评估模式。

Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment.

作者信息

Rosenthal G E, Harper D L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):425-42. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30088-8.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30088-8
PMID:8000481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cleveland Health Quality Choice Coalition was established in 1989 as a voluntary, collaborative effort between hospitals, physicians, and purchasers in the Cleveland metropolitan area to assess the quality and efficiency of care in 31 hospitals. The objective of the project is to produce high-fidelity comparative hospital outcomes data that support market-based health care reform strategies.

METHODS

The project reports on a broad spectrum of hospital outcomes, including patient satisfaction, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, hospital-acquired complications, and cesarean section rates for adult medical, surgical, obstetrical, and intensive care patients. Intensive care outcomes and patient satisfaction are assessed using previously validated measurement systems. Outcomes for medical, surgical, and obstetrical patients are examined using a standardized data collection and severity adjustment methodology developed by Cleveland physicians and an independent consultant.

RESULTS

The project released its initial report to purchasers in April 1993, with subsequent reports scheduled for release every six months. Several policies, procedures, and programs have been instituted to ensure data quality and participant buy-in. These include initial testing and rigorous validation of all outcomes measurement systems before release of data, a commitment to continuously refine risk-adjustment methodologies, independent auditing of data reliability, and a series of user-training workshops for project participants and local news media.

CONCLUSION

The early success of Cleveland Health Quality Choice Coalition demonstrates that it is possible for purchasers and providers to cooperatively assess the quality of health care on a regional basis and to institute a market-based strategy for health care reform. Further evaluation is needed to determine how performance data being reported are used by purchasers in selecting health care and by hospitals for quality improvement.

摘要

背景

克利夫兰健康质量选择联盟成立于1989年,是克利夫兰都会区的医院、医生和采购方之间的一项自愿合作项目,旨在评估31家医院的医疗质量和效率。该项目的目标是生成高保真的医院对比结果数据,以支持基于市场的医疗改革策略。

方法

该项目报告了广泛的医院结果,包括患者满意度、住院死亡率、住院时间、医院获得性并发症以及成人内科、外科、产科和重症监护患者的剖宫产率。重症监护结果和患者满意度使用先前验证过的测量系统进行评估。内科、外科和产科患者的结果使用由克利夫兰医生和一名独立顾问开发的标准化数据收集和严重程度调整方法进行检查。

结果

该项目于1993年4月向采购方发布了初始报告,随后的报告计划每六个月发布一次。已经制定了几项政策、程序和计划,以确保数据质量和参与者的认可。这些措施包括在发布数据之前对所有结果测量系统进行初步测试和严格验证、承诺不断完善风险调整方法、对数据可靠性进行独立审计,以及为项目参与者和当地新闻媒体举办一系列用户培训研讨会。

结论

克利夫兰健康质量选择联盟的早期成功表明,采购方和供应商有可能在区域基础上合作评估医疗质量,并制定基于市场的医疗改革策略。需要进一步评估,以确定采购方在选择医疗服务时如何使用所报告的绩效数据,以及医院如何利用这些数据进行质量改进。

相似文献

1
Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment.克利夫兰健康质量选择:一种基于社区合作的结果评估模式。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):425-42. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30088-8.
2
Using hospital performance data in quality improvement: the Cleveland Health Quality Choice experience.利用医院绩效数据进行质量改进:克利夫兰健康质量选择项目的经验
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jul;24(7):347-60. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30386-8.
3
Designing the Optimal Health Assessment System: the Cleveland Quality Choice (CHQC) example.
Am J Med Qual. 1996 Spring;11(1):S66-9.
4
Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC)--an ongoing collaborative, community-based outcomes assessment program.克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)——一个正在进行的基于社区合作的结果评估项目。
New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):321-5.
5
Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice.使用基于生理学的预后指标对重症监护结果进行全社区评估:克利夫兰健康质量选择对重症监护服务的影响
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):793-801. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.3.793.
6
Cleveland communities collaborate in effort to evaluate hospital efficiency and quality.
QRC Advis. 1995 Apr;11(6):1, 6-7.
7
The California Hospital Outcomes Project: using administrative data to compare hospital performance.加利福尼亚医院结果项目:利用行政数据比较医院绩效。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Dec;21(12):668-82. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30195-x.
8
The use of intensive care unit severity scoring systems in reimbursement strategies.
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):145-56.
9
A partnership takes a gamble to measure quality.
Bus Health. 1992 Mar 15;10(4):20-2, 26-7.
10
Cleveland and Cincinnati: can releasing quality data make friends and influence care?
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993 Jul-Aug;5(6):12-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.关于用于收集医院患者护理感知数据的调查工具的文献综述。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1996-2017. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00475.x.
2
Neonatal disease severity scoring systems.新生儿疾病严重程度评分系统。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Jan;90(1):F11-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.048488.
3
Is there a July phenomenon? The effect of July admission on intensive care mortality and length of stay in teaching hospitals.
存在“七月现象”吗?七月入院对教学医院重症监护死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):639-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20605.x.
4
Mortality and length of stay in a veterans affairs hospital and private sector hospitals serving a common market.在服务于同一市场的退伍军人事务医院和私立医院中的死亡率及住院时长。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):601-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.11209.x.
5
Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act.《患者自我决定法案》实施后“不要复苏”医嘱使用情况的变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):343-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20522.x.
6
Using research to inform quality programmes.利用研究为质量改进项目提供信息。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 5;326(7392):759-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.759.
7
Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?老年患者比年轻患者对医院护理更满意吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):23-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20114.x.
8
Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.质量改进计划的评估
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):270-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.270.
9
Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.出生证明数据的可靠性:与病历信息的多医院比较
Matern Child Health J. 2002 Sep;6(3):169-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1019726112597.
10
The relationship of post-acute home care use to Medicaid utilization and expenditures.急性后期家庭护理的使用与医疗补助计划的利用及支出之间的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):683-710. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00044.