Suppr超能文献

症状筛查与诊断程序之间的一致性:霍普金斯症状清单-25与综合国际诊断访谈I

Concordance between symptom screening and diagnostic procedure: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview I.

作者信息

Sandanger I, Moum T, Ingebrigtsen G, Dalgard O S, Sørensen T, Bruusgaard D

机构信息

Department of Social Insurance Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;33(7):345-54. doi: 10.1007/s001270050064.

Abstract

The definition of case is a core issue in psychiatric epidemiology. Psychiatric symptom screening scales have been extensively used in population studies for many decades. Structured diagnostic interviews have become available during recent years to give exact diagnoses through carefully undertaken procedures. The aim of this article was to assess how well the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) predicted cases by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and find the optimal cut-offs on the HSCL-25 for each diagnosis and gender. Characteristics of concordant and discordant cases were explored. In a Norwegian two-stage survey mental health problems were measured by the HSCL-25 and the CIDI. Only 46% of the present CIDI diagnoses were predicted by the HSCL-25. Comorbidity between CIDI diagnoses was found more than four times as often in the concordant cases (case agreed upon by both instruments) than in the discordant CIDI cases. Concordant cases had more depression and panic/generalized anxiety disorders. Neither the anxiety nor the depression subscales improved the prediction of anxiety or depression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves confirmed that the HSCL-25 gave best information about depression. Except for phobia it predicted best for men. Optimal HSCL-25 cut-off was 1.67 for men and 1.75 for women. Of the discordant HSCL-25 cases, one-third reported no symptoms in the CIDI, one-third reported symptoms in the CIDI anxiety module, and the rest had symptoms spread across the modules. With the exception of depression, the HSCL-25 was insufficient to select individuals for further investigation of diagnosis. The two instruments to a large extent identified different cases. Either the HSCL-25 is a very imperfect indicator of the chosen CIDI diagnoses, or the dimensions of mental illness measured by each of the instruments are different and clearly only partly overlapping.

摘要

病例的定义是精神科流行病学中的一个核心问题。精神科症状筛查量表在人群研究中已广泛使用了数十年。近年来,结构化诊断访谈已开始应用,通过仔细执行的程序来做出准确诊断。本文的目的是评估霍普金斯症状清单-25(HSCL-25)通过复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)预测病例的效果,并找出针对每种诊断和性别的HSCL-25最佳临界值。对一致和不一致病例的特征进行了探究。在一项挪威两阶段调查中,使用HSCL-25和CIDI对心理健康问题进行了测量。HSCL-25仅预测了当前CIDI诊断的46%。在一致病例(两种工具均认可的病例)中发现的CIDI诊断合并症比不一致的CIDI病例多四倍以上。一致病例有更多的抑郁症和惊恐/广泛性焦虑症。焦虑和抑郁分量表均未改善对焦虑或抑郁的预测。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线证实,HSCL-25提供了关于抑郁症的最佳信息。除恐怖症外,它对男性的预测效果最佳。男性的HSCL-25最佳临界值为1.67,女性为1.75。在不一致的HSCL-25病例中,三分之一在CIDI中报告无任何症状,三分之一在CIDI焦虑模块中报告有症状,其余症状分布在各个模块中。除抑郁症外,HSCL-25不足以挑选个体进行进一步的诊断调查。这两种工具在很大程度上识别出了不同的病例。要么HSCL-25是所选CIDI诊断的非常不完善的指标,要么每种工具所测量的精神疾病维度不同且显然仅部分重叠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验