Chapman K J, Pepler C
Region 3 Hospital Corporation, New Brunswick, Canada.
Cancer Nurs. 1998 Aug;21(4):226-34. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199808000-00002.
This article describes an exploratory, cross-sectional, correlational study designed to examine the relationships among general coping style, hope, and anticipatory grief in a convenience sample of 61 family members of people with terminal cancer. The framework for this study was based on grief theory, stress and coping, and transitions (2). Data were collected by the Jalowiec Coping Scale (3), the Herth Hope Index (4), the Non-Death Version of the Grief Experience Inventory (5), and a background information sheet. Findings revealed that family members experienced individual anticipatory grief patterns. Women reported more anger/hostility and despair than men. Adult children, more highly educated family members, family members not living with the ill person, and nonprimary caregivers also expressed more anger/hostility. Multiple regression results showed that emotive coping and hope accounted for significant variance in despair, somatization, and loss of control. Emotive coping contributed significant variation in anger/hostility, whereas lack of hope accounted for variation in social isolation. Neither the general coping styles nor hope significantly predicted death anxiety. The findings provide a base for future research and nursing practice.
本文描述了一项探索性的横断面相关性研究,该研究旨在对61名晚期癌症患者的家庭成员这一便利样本,考察一般应对方式、希望和预期性悲伤之间的关系。本研究的框架基于悲伤理论、压力与应对以及转变理论(2)。数据通过Jalowiec应对量表(3)、赫思希望指数(4)、悲伤经历量表非死亡版(5)以及一份背景信息表收集。研究结果显示,家庭成员经历了个体预期性悲伤模式。女性比男性报告了更多的愤怒/敌意和绝望情绪。成年子女、受教育程度较高的家庭成员、未与患病者同住的家庭成员以及非主要照顾者也表达了更多的愤怒/敌意。多元回归结果表明,情感应对和希望在绝望、躯体化和失控方面解释了显著的方差变异。情感应对在愤怒/敌意方面贡献了显著变异,而希望的缺乏则解释了社交隔离方面的变异。一般应对方式和希望均未显著预测死亡焦虑。这些研究结果为未来的研究和护理实践提供了基础。