Kornbluth M, Liang D H, Paloma A, Schnittger I
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, California 94305-5233, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998 Jul;11(7):693-701. doi: 10.1053/je.1998.v11.a90474.
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of native tissue harmonic imaging on endocardial border definition, wall motion scoring, and visualization of intracardiac structures.
For wall motion analysis, 60 consecutive patients underwent standard transthoracic echocardiograms in both harmonic and fundamental modes. Three experienced echocardiographers reviewed each echocardiogram. Endocardial border definition for each wall segment was graded from 1 to 4 (1 = excellent endocardial definition). Wall motion was scored by using a standard 16-segment model and 1 to 5 scale. For visualization of cardiac structures, 50 consecutive patients were studied. Two experienced interpreters reviewed each echocardiogram for both normal and abnormal structures by using the following scoring scale: (1) harmonic is much better than fundamental, (2) harmonic is slightly better than fundamental, (3) harmonic and fundamental are equivalent, (4) fundamental is slightly better than harmonic, and (5) fundamental is much better than harmonic. Visualization of 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.66) of all segments improved in harmonic mode, with 26% (95% CI 0.24 to 0.29) improving from poor/not seen to good/excellent. Of 444 segments deemed poor/not seen, visualization of 312 (70%) (95% CI 0.66 to 0.75) improved to good/excellent with harmonic mode. Of these 312 segments, 55% comprised the lateral and anterior walls on apical views. Interobserver agreement on endocardial border definition was 82% to 86%. Scoring of wall motion was altered in 171 of 1075 (16%) of segments by harmonic mode. This was significantly greater than the interobserver disagreement, which was only 10% (p<0.002). Mitral valve chordae and papillary muscles were visualized slightly/much better with harmonic mode in 40 of 50 echocardiograms. Left atrial boundaries were seen slightly/much better in harmonic mode in 29 of 50 studies. Abnormal structures were seen slightly/much better in harmonic mode in 12 of 14 cases.
Native tissue harmonic imaging has significant impact on endocardial border definition and wall motion scoring and improves the visualization of both normal and abnormal cardiac structures.
本研究的目的是探讨组织谐波成像对心内膜边界清晰度、室壁运动评分以及心内结构可视化的影响。
对于室壁运动分析,60例连续患者分别接受了谐波模式和基波模式下的标准经胸超声心动图检查。三位经验丰富的超声心动图医师对每份超声心动图进行评估。每个室壁节段的心内膜边界清晰度按1至4级进行分级(1级 = 心内膜清晰度极佳)。室壁运动采用标准的16节段模型和1至5级评分。对于心脏结构的可视化,研究了50例连续患者。两位经验丰富的解读人员使用以下评分量表对每份超声心动图的正常和异常结构进行评估:(1)谐波模式远优于基波模式;(2)谐波模式略优于基波模式;(3)谐波模式与基波模式相当;(4)基波模式略优于谐波模式;(5)基波模式远优于谐波模式。在谐波模式下,所有节段中64%(95%置信区间[CI]为0.61至0.66)的可视化效果得到改善,其中26%(95%CI为0.24至0.29)从差/未见改善为好/极佳。在444个被判定为差/未见的节段中,312个(70%)(95%CI为0.66至0.75)在谐波模式下可视化效果改善为好/极佳。在这312个节段中,55%位于心尖视图的侧壁和前壁。观察者间在心内膜边界清晰度方面的一致性为82%至86%。在1075个节段中的171个(16%)节段,谐波模式改变了室壁运动评分。这显著高于观察者间的分歧率,后者仅为10%(p<0.002)。在50份超声心动图中的40份中,二尖瓣腱索和乳头肌在谐波模式下的可视化效果略好/好得多。在50项研究中的29项中,左心房边界在谐波模式下的显示略好/好得多。在14例病例中的第12例中,异常结构在谐波模式下的显示略好/好得多。
组织谐波成像对心内膜边界清晰度和室壁运动评分有显著影响,并改善了正常和异常心脏结构的可视化。