Spencer K T, Bednarz J, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Tan J, Godoy I, Lang R M
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Feb;13(2):131-8. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(00)90024-5.
Despite advances in imaging technology, many myocardial segments remain poorly visualized with echocardiography; however, both contrast enhancement and harmonic imaging have shown promise for improving endocardial definition. Fifty subjects with technically limited echocardiograms were studied with fundamental and harmonic imaging as well as during echocardiographic contrast injection. Overall endocardial visualization scores improved with both techniques compared with fundamental imaging. Harmonic imaging improved endocardial visualization in 43% of all segments and in 57% of segments nonvisualized with fundamental imaging. The benefit of harmonic imaging was seen in all segments. Contrast echocardiography had similar overall improvements in visualization (42% of all segments, 67% of segments nonvisualized with fundamental imaging) but was not helpful in all regions. Harmonic imaging outperformed contrast in 9 of 22 segments, whereas contrast was superior in 4 of 22. In a subgroup of patients with very poor images, contrast enhancement was superior, with a greater increase in overall score and a higher salvage rate than harmonic (68% vs 40%).
