Schöffski P, Freund M, Wunder R, Petersen D, Köhne C H, Hecker H, Schubert U, Ganser A
Department of Haematology/Oncology, Hanover University Medical School, D-30625 Hanover, Germany.
BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):379-84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.379.
To compare the feasibility of treatment, safety, and toxicity of intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate prepared in either glucose or intralipid for empirical antimycotic treatment of neutropenic cancer patients.
Single centre stratified, randomised non-blinded phase II study.
University hospital providing tertiary clinical care.
51 neutropenic patients (leukaemia (35), lymphoma (11), solid tumours (5)) with refractory fever of unknown origin (24) or pneumonia (27).
Amphotericin B 0.75 mg/kg/day in 250 ml glucose 5% solution or mixed with 250 ml intralipid 20%, given on eight consecutive days then alternate days, as a 1-4 hour infusion.
Feasibility of treatment, subjective tolerance (questionnaire), and objective toxicity (common toxicity criteria of the National Cancer Institute).
Study arms were balanced for age, sex, underlying malignancy, renal and liver function, and pre- and concomitant treatment with antibiotics and nephrotoxic agents. No statistically significant or clinically relevant differences were found between the treatment groups for: daily or cumulative dose and duration of treatment with amphotericin B; incidence and time of dose modifications or infusion duration changes related to toxicity; dose or duration of symptomatic support with opiates, antipyretics, or antihistamines; renal function; subjective tolerance; most common toxicity scores; course of infection; and incidence of treatment failures. Patients treated with amphotericin B in intralipid were given fewer diuretics (P<0.05) and therefore had more peripheral oedema (P<0.01) and needed less potassium supplementation (P<0.05) than patients given amphotericin in glucose. Acute respiratory events were more common in the intralipid arm (P<0.05).
Amphotericin B 0.75 mg/kg/day in intralipid given on eight consecutive days then alternate days provides no benefit and is associated with potential pulmonary side effects possibly because of fat overload or an incompatibility of the two drugs.
比较用葡萄糖或脂质体制备的静脉注射两性霉素B去氧胆酸盐用于中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者经验性抗真菌治疗的可行性、安全性和毒性。
单中心分层随机非盲II期研究。
提供三级临床护理的大学医院。
51例中性粒细胞减少患者(白血病35例、淋巴瘤11例、实体瘤5例),伴有不明原因的难治性发热(24例)或肺炎(27例)。
两性霉素B 0.75mg/kg/天,加入250ml 5%葡萄糖溶液或与250ml 20%脂质体混合,连续8天给药,然后隔天给药,静脉输注1-4小时。
治疗的可行性、主观耐受性(问卷调查)和客观毒性(美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准)。
研究组在年龄、性别、潜在恶性肿瘤、肾功能和肝功能以及抗生素和肾毒性药物的前期和同期治疗方面均衡。在治疗组之间未发现以下方面有统计学显著差异或临床相关差异:两性霉素B的每日或累积剂量及治疗持续时间;与毒性相关的剂量调整或输注持续时间变化的发生率和时间;阿片类药物、退烧药或抗组胺药的对症支持剂量或持续时间;肾功能;主观耐受性;最常见的毒性评分;感染病程;以及治疗失败的发生率。与用葡萄糖给予两性霉素B的患者相比,用脂质体给予两性霉素B治疗的患者使用利尿剂较少(P<0.05),因此外周水肿较多(P<0.01),补钾需求较少(P<0.05)。急性呼吸事件在脂质体组更常见(P<0.05)。
连续8天然后隔天给予脂质体中0.75mg/kg/天的两性霉素B没有益处,并且可能由于脂肪超载或两种药物不相容而与潜在的肺部副作用相关。