Mudge B, Forcier D, Slattery M J
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Children's Hospital, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Pediatr Nurs. 1998 Mar-Apr;24(2):142-5, 149.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of heparin and normal saline flush solutions in maintaining the patency of 24-gauge peripheral intermittent infusion devices (PIIDs). A prospective, non-randomized, sequential, blinded study design was conducted on a pediatric and a neonatal intensive care unit. The sample consisted of 134 catheters in 61 patients. Heparin and saline flush groups were similar for age, PIID placement site, irritating substances infused, and initial IV function. The median duration of catheters flushed with heparin was 42 hours and with saline was 35.3 hours. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis indicated that the duration of catheters flushed with heparin was significantly longer than those flushed with saline (p = .02). More catheters flushed with saline were removed because of problems (p = .027). Results of this study suggest that heparin is more effective than saline in maintaining the patency of small, 24-gauge catheters.
本研究的目的是比较肝素和生理盐水冲洗液在维持24号外周间歇性输液装置(PIID)通畅方面的有效性。在儿科和新生儿重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性、非随机、序贯、双盲研究设计。样本包括61例患者的134根导管。肝素冲洗组和生理盐水冲洗组在年龄、PIID放置部位、输注的刺激性物质以及初始静脉功能方面相似。用肝素冲洗的导管中位持续时间为42小时,用生理盐水冲洗的为35.3小时。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,用肝素冲洗的导管持续时间显著长于用生理盐水冲洗的导管(p = 0.02)。更多用生理盐水冲洗的导管因出现问题而被拔除(p = 0.027)。本研究结果表明,在维持24号小导管通畅方面,肝素比生理盐水更有效。