• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福莫特罗治疗期间的生活质量:哮喘特异性问卷与通用问卷的比较。加拿大和荷兰福莫特罗研究人员。

Quality of life during formoterol treatment: comparison between asthma-specific and generic questionnaires. Canadian and the Dutch Formoterol Investigators.

作者信息

van der Molen T, Sears M R, de Graaff C S, Postma D S, Meyboom-de Jong B

机构信息

Groningen University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1998 Jul;12(1):30-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010030.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.98.12010030
PMID:9701410
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of treating patients with moderate asthma with formoterol on quality of life (QoL) and to compare several questionnaires in their ability to detect changes in QoL. In an eight month multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with asthma using daily inhaled corticosteroids and beta2-agonists (> or = 5 inhalations x week(-1)) were randomized to 6 months treatment with formoterol 24 microg b.i.d. (by Turbuhaler) or a matching placebo. Patients recorded symptoms (maximal score 21) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) twice daily. QoL was measured with two asthma-specific questionnaires, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ), and with two generic QoL forms, i.e. the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the Psychological and General Well-Being scale (PGWB) at randomization and after 6 months of treatment. Out of 110 patients studied, 56 received formoterol and 54 placebo. Mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second was 65% predicted. Mean morning PEF was 369 L x min(-1). Mean total symptom score was 3.6. Morning PEF increased (26.8 L x min(-1), p=0.0001) and symptoms decreased (-1.23, p=0.012) in the formoterol group in contrast to placebo. QoL improvements were measured in the LWAQ total score (baseline 0.61, change -0.05, p=0.048) and the physical construct of the LWAQ (baseline 0.71, change 0.07, p=0.044). The AQLQ and the generic QoL instruments showed no significant changes. In conclusion, the improvement in quality of life reported after 6 months was very small and only reflected by the Living with Asthma Questionnaire.

摘要

本研究旨在调查福莫特罗治疗中度哮喘患者对生活质量(QoL)的影响,并比较几种问卷检测生活质量变化的能力。在一项为期8个月的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,使用每日吸入糖皮质激素和β2受体激动剂(≥5次吸入/周)的哮喘患者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期6个月的福莫特罗24微克每日两次(通过都保)治疗,另一组接受匹配的安慰剂治疗。患者每天记录症状(最高得分21分)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)两次。在随机分组时和治疗6个月后,使用两种哮喘特异性问卷,即哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)和哮喘患者生活问卷(LWAQ),以及两种通用生活质量量表,即简明健康状况调查量表(SF36)和心理与总体幸福感量表(PGWB)来测量生活质量。在研究的110名患者中,56名接受福莫特罗治疗,54名接受安慰剂治疗。一秒用力呼气容积的平均基线值为预测值的65%。平均晨PEF为369升/分钟。平均总症状评分为3.6分。与安慰剂组相比,福莫特罗组的晨PEF升高(26.8升/分钟,p = 0.0001),症状减轻(-1.23,p = 0.012)。LWAQ总分(基线0.61,变化-0.05,p = 0.048)和LWAQ的身体维度(基线0.71,变化0.07,p = 0.044)的生活质量有所改善。AQLQ和通用生活质量工具未显示出显著变化。总之,6个月后报告的生活质量改善非常小,仅在哮喘患者生活问卷中有所体现。

相似文献

1
Quality of life during formoterol treatment: comparison between asthma-specific and generic questionnaires. Canadian and the Dutch Formoterol Investigators.福莫特罗治疗期间的生活质量:哮喘特异性问卷与通用问卷的比较。加拿大和荷兰福莫特罗研究人员。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Jul;12(1):30-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010030.
2
Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators.长效β受体激动剂福莫特罗对使用吸入性糖皮质激素的哮喘患者哮喘控制情况的影响。荷兰及加拿大福莫特罗研究组。
Thorax. 1997 Jun;52(6):535-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.6.535.
3
Comparison between formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. and on-demand salbutamol in moderate persistent asthma.福莫特罗12微克每日两次与按需使用沙丁胺醇治疗中度持续性哮喘的比较。
Respir Med. 2001 Jan;95(1):64-70. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0972.
4
Discriminative aspects of two generic and two asthma-specific instruments: relation with symptoms, bronchodilator use and lung function in patients with mild asthma.两种通用工具和两种哮喘特异性工具的鉴别特征:与轻度哮喘患者症状、支气管扩张剂使用及肺功能的关系
Qual Life Res. 1997 May;6(4):353-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1018483310277.
5
Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial.布地奈德福莫特罗单剂量吸入器治疗成人和青少年中重度哮喘的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验
Drugs. 2006;66(17):2235-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666170-00006.
6
Budesonide/formoterol improves lung function compared with budesonide alone in children with asthma.与单独使用布地奈德相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗可改善哮喘儿童的肺功能。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006 Sep;17(6):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00425.x.
7
Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group.在中重度哮喘患者规律使用福莫特罗期间的持续支气管保护、支气管扩张及症状控制。加拿大福莫特罗/按需使用1研究组
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar;103(3 Pt 1):427-35. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70467-7.
8
Comparison of the effects of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma.沙美特罗与福莫特罗对重度哮喘患者疗效的比较。
Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1401-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1401.
9
Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation and bronchodilator sensitivity after regular treatment with formoterol in subjects with stable asthma.福莫特罗常规治疗稳定期哮喘患者后β2肾上腺素能受体调节及支气管扩张剂敏感性
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Mar;101(3):337-41. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70245-3.
10
Low-dose formoterol Turbuhaler (Oxis) b.i.d., a 3-month placebo-controlled comparison with terbutaline (q.i.d.).低剂量福莫特罗都保(奥克斯),每日两次,与特布他林(每日四次)进行为期3个月的安慰剂对照比较。
Respir Med. 1998 Aug;92(8):1040-5. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90352-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.福莫特罗用于慢性哮喘的常规治疗:严重不良事件
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD006923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006923.pub3.
2
Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children.长效β2受体激动剂与相同剂量吸入性糖皮质激素联合应用于成人及儿童慢性哮喘的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD005535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005535.pub2.
3
Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids versus higher dose inhaled steroids in adults and children with persistent asthma.
在患有持续性哮喘的成人和儿童中,长效β2受体激动剂与高剂量吸入性类固醇联合使用与单纯使用高剂量吸入性类固醇的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2.
4
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults and children.对于未使用过类固醇的成人和儿童持续性哮喘,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.pub2.
5
Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid.用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的长效β2受体激动剂,其背景治疗包含不同种类或不包含吸入性糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001385.pub2.
6
A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入长效β2受体激动剂治疗阻塞性肺疾病的获益-风险评估
Drug Saf. 2004;27(10):689-715. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427100-00001.
7
Regular treatment with long acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma.长效β受体激动剂常规治疗与短效β受体激动剂每日常规治疗用于稳定期哮喘成人和儿童的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(4):CD003901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003901.
8
Health-related quality of life in asthma: a comparison between the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.哮喘患者与健康相关的生活质量:圣乔治呼吸问卷与哮喘生活质量问卷的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Dec;11(8):729-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1020897816228.