• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时两种记忆能够及不能同时被提取。

When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently.

作者信息

Rohrer D, Pashler H, Etchegaray J

机构信息

George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):731-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03211393.

DOI:10.3758/bf03211393
PMID:9701965
Abstract

We examined whether two memories can be retrieved concurrently from long-term memory. In Experiment 1, the subjects recalled words, either from two categories--alternating between the two--or from just one category. In Experiment 2, the subjects recalled two words belonging to either the same category or different categories, and the category prompts for these two responses appeared either simultaneously or successively. The results of both studies are consistent with the view that two items from different categories must be retrieved serially, whereas two items from the same category can be retrieved in parallel.

摘要

我们研究了能否从长期记忆中同时提取两种记忆。在实验1中,受试者从两类单词中回忆单词,即在两类之间交替回忆,或者只从一类中回忆。在实验2中,受试者回忆两个属于同一类别或不同类别的单词,这两个反应的类别提示要么同时出现,要么相继出现。两项研究的结果均与以下观点一致:来自不同类别的两个项目必须按顺序提取,而来自同一类别的两个项目可以并行提取。

相似文献

1
When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently.何时两种记忆能够及不能同时被提取。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):731-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03211393.
2
Adult age differences in the temporal characteristics of category free recall.成人在类别自由回忆时间特征上的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 1998 Jun;13(2):256-66. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.2.256.
3
The role of categorical information in processing relational attributes.
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):756-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03201100.
4
Lexical coherence in short-term memory: strategic reconstruction or "semantic glue"?短期记忆中的词汇连贯:策略性重构还是“语义黏合剂”?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):1967-82. doi: 10.1080/17470210802697672. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
5
Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory.语义场中的搜索:我们如何在记忆中进行检索。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):513-34. doi: 10.1111/tops.12151. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
6
The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):681-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03211389.
7
You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers.你说西红柿?与陌生人相比,亲密伴侣间的协作记忆会导致更多错误记忆。
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):262-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801491.
8
Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.儿童听力损失对语义记忆组织的影响:典型性与关联性。
Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):686-702. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240596.56622.0c.
9
Developmentally invariant dissociations in children's true and false memories: not all relatedness is created equal.儿童真实记忆与错误记忆中发展不变的分离现象:并非所有关联性都是等同的。
Child Dev. 2006 Jul-Aug;77(4):1112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00922.x.
10
Semantic relevance and semantic disorders.语义相关性和语义障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):439-52. doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaze patterns reflect the retrieval and selection of memories in a context-dependent object location retrieval task.注视模式反映了在依赖上下文的物体位置检索任务中记忆的检索和选择。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59815-9.
2
Emotional regulation strategies in daily life: the intensity of emotions and regulation choice.日常生活中的情绪调节策略:情绪强度与调节选择。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1218694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218694. eCollection 2023.
3
Deep Learning Based Walking Tasks Classification in Older Adults Using fNIRS.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of one memory retrieval on a subsequent memory retrieval.一次记忆提取对后续记忆提取的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1974 May;2(3):467-71. doi: 10.3758/BF03196906.
2
On the relative and absolute strength of a memory trace.论记忆痕迹的相对强度和绝对强度。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Mar;24(2):188-201. doi: 10.3758/bf03200880.
3
Attentional limits in memory retrieval.记忆检索中的注意力限制。
基于深度学习的使用 fNIRS 的老年人行走任务分类。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:3437-3447. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3306365. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
Multiple memories can be simultaneously reactivated during sleep as effectively as a single memory.多个记忆在睡眠期间可以像单个记忆一样有效地同时被重新激活。
Commun Biol. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01512-0.
5
Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.同时进行的任务对记忆提取的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):96-103. doi: 10.3758/bf03196472.
6
Searching for two things at once: evidence of exclusivity in semantic and autobiographical memory retrieval.
Mem Cognit. 2001 Dec;29(8):1185-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03206388.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Sep;21(5):1339-48. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1339.
4
Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.
Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220.
5
An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall.自由回忆中潜伏期与反应间隔时间的分析。
Mem Cognit. 1994 Sep;22(5):511-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03198390.