• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逝者有利益诉求吗?身后研究的政策问题。

Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life.

作者信息

Nelkin D, Andrews L

机构信息

Department of Sociology and School of Law, New York University, USA.

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1998;24(2-3):261-91.

PMID:9702275
Abstract

The importance of establishing rights in a dead body has been, and will continue to be, magnified by scientific advancements. The recent explosion of research and information concerning biotechnology has created a market place in which human tissues are routinely sold to and by scientists, physicians and others. The human body is a valuable resource.

摘要

随着科学进步,确立尸体权利的重要性一直以来且将持续被放大。近期有关生物技术的研究和信息激增,创造了一个人类组织经常被科学家、医生及其他人员买卖的市场。人体是一种宝贵资源。

相似文献

1
Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life.逝者有利益诉求吗?身后研究的政策问题。
Am J Law Med. 1998;24(2-3):261-91.
2
Human tissue research: who owns the results?人体组织研究:研究结果归谁所有?
J Pat Trademark Off Soc. 1987 Jun;69(6):329-52.
3
Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.超越摩尔:生物技术时代影响人类细胞与基因研究的法律和政策问题
J Leg Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):463-77. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510924.
4
Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology.经济人:生物技术时代人体组织的商业化
Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Sep-Oct;28(5):30-9.
5
Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology.拥有我们的身体:对财产法与生物技术的审视
San Diego Law Rev. 1995;32(4):1167-247.
6
Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.身体部位的所有权:摩尔案在澳大利亚的相关性。
Monash Univ Law Rev. 1993;19(1):217-25.
7
NBAC issues biosamples report.
Nat Med. 1999 Sep;5(9):974. doi: 10.1038/12403.
8
Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples.关于人类组织样本未来潜在用途的知情同意中的伦理考量。
IRB. 1996 Mar-Apr;18(2):6-7.
9
Consent to use of discarded tissues: another impact of AIDS.同意使用废弃组织:艾滋病的另一个影响。
IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):10-1.
10
Whose tissues are they anyway? A proposal for state ownership of the human body and its parts.它们到底是谁的组织?关于人体及其各部分归国家所有的提议。
J Cardiovasc Diagn Proced. 1994;12(3):145-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextual Exceptionalism After Death: An Information Ethics Approach to Post-Mortem Privacy in Health Data Research.死后的情境例外主义:健康数据研究中死后隐私的信息伦理方法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Aug 3;28(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00387-0.
2
Extracting and Standardizing Medical Examiner Data to Improve Health.提取和规范法医数据以改善健康状况。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:63-70. eCollection 2020.
3
Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.依然是人类:呼吁在尸体研究中更加关注道德标准
HEC Forum. 2016 Dec;28(4):355-367. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9309-9.
4
Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders and Brain and Body Donation Program.亚利桑那衰老与神经退行性疾病研究以及脑与身体捐赠项目
Neuropathology. 2015 Aug;35(4):354-89. doi: 10.1111/neup.12189. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
"Even if I were to consent, my family will never agree": exploring autopsy services for posthumous occupational lung disease compensation among mineworkers in South Africa.“即使我同意,我的家人也绝不会同意”:探索南非矿工死后职业性肺部疾病赔偿的尸检服务。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Jan 24;6:19518. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19518.
6
Biobanking and deceased persons.生物库与已故者。
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):415-23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1049-y. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
7
The story of the body and the story of the person: towards an ethics of representing human bodies and body-parts.
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-6492-2.
8
They might as well be in Bolivia: race, ethnicity and the problem of solid organ donation.他们或许还不如身处玻利维亚:种族、族裔与实体器官捐赠问题。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Dec;20(6):563-75. doi: 10.1023/a:1009927312427.