Thomas B J, Pierpoint T, Taylor-Robinson D, Renton A M
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary's, Paddington, London, UK.
Int J STD AIDS. 1998 Aug;9(8):448-51. doi: 10.1258/0956462981922601.
Population screening and intervention programmes can reduce the prevalence and incidence of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, especially if sensitive molecular diagnostic tests are used. However, diagnostic tests that perform well on genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic populations may be less useful for screening, particularly if the majority of infected subjects are asymptomatic and their samples contain fewer organisms. We have compared the extent of low organism load in cervical and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic chlamydia-positive women, by using a direct fluorescent antibody staining method and counting the chlamydial elementary bodies (EBs). We have investigated the ability of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA; MicroTrak) and a DNA amplification (ligase chain reaction; LCR) assay to detect low numbers of organisms in cervical samples and the ability of the LCR assay to detect low numbers of organisms in urine. A low organism load (< 10 EBs) was seen by direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining in about 30% of cervical samples and in about 75% of urines from chlamydia-positive women; the proportions in symptomatic women were not significantly different from those in asymptomatic women. The EIA identified only 16% of cervical samples that contained < 10 EBs by DFA staining; the LCR identified 100% of cervical samples and 93% of urine samples that contained < 10 EBs by DFA staining. The findings suggest that the ability of chlamydial diagnostic tests to identify positive women should be similar among patients attending a GUM clinic and those taking part in a population screening programme, and that sensitive molecular assays such as the LCR should identify subjects with a low organism load in both groups.
人群筛查和干预项目可以降低沙眼衣原体感染的患病率和发病率,尤其是在使用敏感的分子诊断检测方法时。然而,在性传播疾病(GUM)诊所人群中表现良好的诊断检测方法,对于筛查可能不太有用,特别是如果大多数感染对象没有症状且其样本中病原体数量较少。我们通过直接荧光抗体染色法并计数衣原体原体(EBs),比较了有症状和无症状衣原体阳性女性宫颈和尿液样本中低病原体载量的程度。我们研究了酶免疫测定法(EIA;MicroTrak)和DNA扩增法(连接酶链反应;LCR)检测宫颈样本中少量病原体的能力,以及LCR检测尿液中少量病原体的能力。通过直接荧光抗体(DFA)染色,在约30%的衣原体阳性女性宫颈样本和约75%的尿液中发现了低病原体载量(<10个EBs);有症状女性中的比例与无症状女性中的比例没有显著差异。EIA仅识别出16%通过DFA染色含有<10个EBs的宫颈样本;LCR识别出100%通过DFA染色含有<10个EBs的宫颈样本和93%的尿液样本。研究结果表明,衣原体诊断检测方法识别阳性女性的能力,在就诊于GUM诊所的患者和参与人群筛查项目的患者中应该相似,并且像LCR这样的敏感分子检测方法应该能够识别两组中病原体载量低的对象。