• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在铜冶炼厂工作条件下对化学滤毒盒式半面罩呼吸器防护因数的测量。

Measurement of protection factors of chemical cartridge, half-mask respirators under working conditions in a copper smelter.

作者信息

Morre D E, Smith T J

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1976 Aug;37(8):453-8. doi: 10.1080/0002889768507495.

DOI:10.1080/0002889768507495
PMID:970320
Abstract

The performance of three commonly used chemical cartridge respirators for SO2 was measured under working conditions in a copper smelter. An effective SO2 protection factor for each man-respirator trial was calculated as the ratio between average SO2 concentrations sampled outside the respirator mask and that simultaneously sampled from inside the mask. The in-use SO2 protection afforded by the three respirators proved to be highly variable with mean protection factors of 22, 18, and 13. The distributions of the protection factors and the effects of mask type, facial size, and mask comfort are discussed.

摘要

在一家铜冶炼厂的工作条件下,对三种常用的用于防护二氧化硫的化学滤毒罐式呼吸器进行了性能测试。每次人-呼吸器试验的有效二氧化硫防护系数计算为呼吸器面罩外部采样的平均二氧化硫浓度与面罩内部同时采样的浓度之比。事实证明,这三种呼吸器在实际使用中的二氧化硫防护效果差异很大,平均防护系数分别为22、18和13。文中讨论了防护系数的分布以及面罩类型、面部尺寸和面罩舒适度的影响。

相似文献

1
Measurement of protection factors of chemical cartridge, half-mask respirators under working conditions in a copper smelter.在铜冶炼厂工作条件下对化学滤毒盒式半面罩呼吸器防护因数的测量。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1976 Aug;37(8):453-8. doi: 10.1080/0002889768507495.
2
An effective protection factor study of respirators used by primary lead smelter workers.对铅冶炼厂一线工人使用的呼吸器的有效防护因素研究。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2000 Feb;15(2):235-44. doi: 10.1080/104732200301746.
3
Inhalation exposure of lead in brass foundry workers: the evaluation of the effectiveness of a powered air-purifying respirator and engineering controls.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1983 Oct;44(10):746-51. doi: 10.1080/15298668391405670.
4
Workplace protection factor measurements on powered air-purifying respirators at a secondary lead smelter: results and discussion.二次铅冶炼厂动力空气净化呼吸器的工作场所防护因数测量:结果与讨论
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984 Oct;45(10):681-8. doi: 10.1080/15298668491400449.
5
Inhalation exposure of cadmium workers: effects of respirator usage.镉作业工人的吸入暴露:呼吸器使用的影响。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980 Sep;41(9):624-9. doi: 10.1080/15298668091425400.
6
Variability in protection afforded by half-mask respirators against styrene exposure in the field.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Dec;51(12):625-31. doi: 10.1080/15298669091370266.
7
Respirator protection factors: Part II-protection factors of supplied-air respirators.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980 May;41(5):376-81. doi: 10.1080/15298668091424915.
8
Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators: steel mill operations.半面罩呼吸器的现场性能测量:钢铁厂作业
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Nov;59(11):789-95. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010974.
9
Determination of program protection factors for half-mask respirators used at a mineral sands separation plant.确定用于矿砂分离厂的半面罩呼吸器的程序防护因数。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Nov;53(11):713-20. doi: 10.1080/15298669291360418.
10
Workplace protection factors for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.N95过滤式面罩呼吸器的工作场所防护因素。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Sep;4(9):698-707. doi: 10.1080/15459620701517764.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 1-Particle Size Selection Performance.一种用于口罩内采样的新型微型可吸入式采样器:第1部分 - 粒径选择性能
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Nov;60(9):1072-1083. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew053. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
Criteria for the collection of useful respirator performance data in the workplace.在工作场所收集有用的呼吸器性能数据的标准。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(4):218-26. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.852282.
3
The effectiveness of respirators measured during styrene exposure in a plastic boat factory.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;65(1):29-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00586055.