Myers W R, Zhuang Z
Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506, USA.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Nov;59(11):789-95. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010974.
Ambient and in-facepiece samples to evaluate the protection provided by negative-pressure, half-facepiece respirators were collected on workers in different areas of a steel mill including a sinter plant and a basic oxygen process shop. Protection was assessed by workplace protection factors (WPF). All the in-facepiece concentrations were dramatically less than the corresponding ambient concentration levels or permissible exposure limits. The geometric mean (GM) ambient and in-facepiece concentrations of iron were found to vary among tasks. Significant differences were also found to occur between the GM ambient exposure levels in which some of the respirators were used. Significant differences in respirator performance as measured by WPF or in-facepiece iron concentration were observed among different brands of respirators. For all job classifications and at all levels of airborne exposure, the fifth percentile estimates for the WPF distributions for each brand of respirator were all greater than 20.
在一家钢铁厂的不同区域(包括烧结厂和基本氧气炼钢车间)对工人进行采样,采集环境样本和面罩内样本,以评估负压半面罩呼吸器提供的防护效果。通过工作场所防护因数(WPF)评估防护效果。所有面罩内的浓度均显著低于相应的环境浓度水平或允许暴露限值。发现铁的几何平均(GM)环境浓度和面罩内浓度因任务而异。在使用某些呼吸器的GM环境暴露水平之间也发现了显著差异。不同品牌的呼吸器在通过WPF或面罩内铁浓度衡量的呼吸器性能方面存在显著差异。对于所有工作分类和所有空气传播暴露水平,每个品牌呼吸器的WPF分布的第五百分位数估计值均大于20。