Bonnet M H, Arand D L
Dayton Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Wright State University, OH 45428, USA.
Sleep. 1998 Aug 1;21(5):477-83.
Many studies have examined the impact of varying levels of sleep loss or sleep disturbance upon the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Virtually no studies have examined the impact of level of physiologic arousal upon measured sleep tendency. In the current study, 12 normal-sleeping young adults took modified multiple sleep latency tests after either watching television for 15 minutes or after a 5-minute walk. This entire protocol was repeated on another week after subjects had been partially sleep deprived by reducing their time in bed by 50%. It was hypothesized that sleep latencies would be significantly shorter after watching television as compared to walking and after partial sleep loss as compared to normal sleep and that these effects would be independent. The results of the study supported all of these hypotheses. ANOVAs showed no significant interaction effects, but sleep latencies were 11.6 and 5.8 minutes following the walk and watching television respectively. Sleep latencies were 9.8 and 7.6 minutes following baseline and partial sleep-deprivation conditions. Heart rate, used as a measure of physiological arousal, was significantly elevated throughout naps following the walk as compared to naps following television viewing. On a theoretical level, these data imply that measured sleepiness is a combination of sleep drive and physiological arousal, and these effects appear to be independent. On a practical level, these data indicate that more care may be necessary in monitoring the activity levels of patients and subjects prior to MSLT evaluations, since physiological arousal may mask the measurement of sleep tendency. Knowledge of the role of arousal in modulating sleepiness can be important in many settings.
许多研究探讨了不同程度的睡眠缺失或睡眠障碍对多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)的影响。实际上,几乎没有研究考察生理唤醒水平对测量的睡眠倾向的影响。在本研究中,12名睡眠正常的年轻人在观看15分钟电视后或进行5分钟步行后接受了改良的多次睡眠潜伏期试验。在受试者通过将卧床时间减少50%而部分睡眠剥夺后的另一周,重复了整个实验方案。研究假设,与步行后相比,观看电视后以及与正常睡眠相比,部分睡眠剥夺后的睡眠潜伏期会显著缩短,并且这些影响是独立的。研究结果支持了所有这些假设。方差分析显示没有显著的交互作用,但步行和观看电视后的睡眠潜伏期分别为11.6分钟和5.8分钟。基线和部分睡眠剥夺条件下的睡眠潜伏期分别为9.8分钟和7.6分钟。作为生理唤醒指标的心率,与观看电视后的小睡相比,步行后的小睡过程中显著升高。从理论层面来看,这些数据意味着测量到的困倦是睡眠驱动力和生理唤醒的综合结果,而且这些影响似乎是独立的。从实际层面来看,这些数据表明,在进行MSLT评估之前,可能需要更加谨慎地监测患者和受试者的活动水平,因为生理唤醒可能会掩盖睡眠倾向的测量。了解唤醒在调节困倦中的作用在许多情况下都可能很重要。